More questions or thoughts on the Jeff Hull Vids... (I think they are really good)
If as stated by Yoda, that you can hit a 5 iron from Acquired Motion and a 6 iron from Total Motion and
a. The speed registered by the 5 iron will be higher than the 6 iron (my speed measured the same)
b. The distance of the 5 iron will be further than the 6 iron
c. The difference between Acquired Motion and Total Motion speed will be about 5 mph (Seems like this
would increase for the longer clubs. Realize 5 mph is guessmate I am sure) which at about 2.3 yds/mph
is about 11 yds
1. Does anyone know of any studies done on this concept?
2. Given this is accurate, then would it not make sense to first
a. Perform Acquired Motion to identify any lack of percison, flaws, etc?
b. Develop the golf stroke in total at Acquired Motion before going on to Total Motion
c. With the Difference between Acquired Motion and Total Motion, it seems to identify and correct or make
adjustments would be best served at the area of introduction, rather than in the Total Motion for all?
3. It does seem that pivot, which can be a problem for a lot of golfers is not adding all that much to
the overall golf stroke, in fact couple with the additional distance the body parts are traveling will further add
possible errors.
Threaded Mode
