What is your prefered Golfing Machine Swing Model?

[lekommend]

After finished watching Paul Hart's Preferred Golfing Machine Swing Model. It's worth a look for all those who have had exposure to TGM.

After 26 years involvement with Homer Kelley's work, Paul Hart (G.S.E.D) shows us his preferred Golfing Machine Swing Model, in the process revealing what he believes to be "the secret of Golf".
If interested, the presentation can be found at :

-http://www.************/TGM_downloads.htm-

IMO, the prefered swing pattern of the "expert" G.S.E.D like Yoda and Paul Hart will lead us to the right path.

For brightening up my path more, may I ask about yours pattern.
What is your prefered combination pattern? (Only the components below.)

3. Basic Stroke-_____
4. Stroke Variations- _____
10. Hinge Action-_____
11. Pressure Ponit Combination- _____
18. Wrist Action-_____
19. Lag Loading- _____
20. Trigger Type- _____
21. Power Pakage Assembly Point- _____
22. Power Pakage Loading Action- _____
24. Power Pakage Release-_____

Please identify each of your prefered components. This would be certainly a worthy description.
Any instruction would be appreciated.

[Mike O]

see this link

http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/s....php?p=4#post4

Does your post violate item#5?

[SwingNorthtoSouth]

We reserve the right to ban members abusing the above.

[Bagger Lance]

LBG and Paul Hart do not have any formal relationship and to the best of my knowledge, even an informal one. I enjoyed Pauls analysis of Peter Crokers swing and it was kind of Peter to offer our members a link to his free videos. I hope it's helped him gain some positive exposure.

Here's the rub. After all of the personal sacrifice, time, effort and cost the Admins have put into this site for the benefit of the members and LBG, it's hard to swallow any advertisement or promotion for instruction elsewhere. This is especially true of an ongoing, contrasting-color signature link that directs members away from our site.

I've been to every other TGM site, past (3 no longer exist) and present, and haven't found anything better than what we have right here. You have my commitment that we will continue building on the rich content we've already established.

Bagger

[birdie_man]

Robert...

I actually agree with you, to a degree....

But I don't know if you've realized....there IS someone in this thread who has a link in their signiture....

You can think of that however you want really.....and take it as seriously as you want....you can't deny tho that some will find it a little grating (rightly so)....

Just wanted to point that out to make sure you're seeing the whole picture.

[Bagger Lance]

It's just that golf is only a game, and should be fun only, and not to take it too seriously.

Robert,

Don't take this personally, I just want to address my thoughts about the above.

I completely agree that golf is a game and it should be fun. But for those in any sports industry, it's much more. There are many professionals here that put bread on the table by..."playing golf". We also have instructors here that make a living by helping others "play golf". This site is owned by Lynn Blake and it's his playground or as he would say "garden". But it's also an indispensible tool for marketing Lynn's business. Which...you guessed it...puts bread on the table.

I play golf in the true sense. It's just a hobby and a passion. Like all of my hobbies and passions, I take them pretty seriously, but they are secondary to faith, family and my real job. This site and the management of it does not put bread on the table for me. However, I take it very seriously. Otherwise...well...if the site goes down for a few days, no biggie. Oh, and I'll get to those videos when I feel like it...I s'pose. Upgrades and new services...ugghhh...when I get around to it.

No way.

I'm very proud of what we've done here with help from Trig and Bambam, and the things we are planning to do. I'm completely absorbed in the development and the side benefits are motivating; helping members in my own way (by developing and running this site), and learning from Lynn and others.

Is golf fun? You bet. It gets better all the time.
Do I take it seriously? Very.
Is this all a game? Of course. But I play it with all my heart.

Lynn has contibuted a tremendous amount of enlightenment to Homers work and it's all here. But the well is deep and there is much more to come.

Bagger

[Martee]

After finished watching Paul Hart's Preferred Golfing Machine Swing Model. It's worth a look for all those who have had exposure to TGM.

After 26 years involvement with Homer Kelley's work, Paul Hart (G.S.E.D) shows us his preferred Golfing Machine Swing Model, in the process revealing what he believes to be "the secret of Golf".
If interested, the presentation can be found at :

-http://www.crokergolfsystem.com/TGM_downloads.htm-

IMO, the prefered swing pattern of the "expert" G.S.E.D like Yoda and Paul Hart will lead us to the right path.

For brightening up my path more, may I ask about yours pattern.
What is your prefered combination pattern? (Only the components below.)

3. Basic Stroke-_____
4. Stroke Variations- _____
10. Hinge Action-_____
11. Pressure Ponit Combination- _____
18. Wrist Action-_____
19. Lag Loading- _____
20. Trigger Type- _____
21. Power Pakage Assembly Point- _____
22. Power Pakage Loading Action- _____
24. Power Pakage Release-_____

Please identify each of your prefered components. This would be certainly a worthy description.
Any instruction would be appreciated.

Why did you select or focus on the components that you did?

It seems to be counter to what one would find in chpt 12 and/or 6-H?

The rationale for the selection of these components would be of interest to me and probably others...

[Yoda]

Again, sorry if I offended anyone.

Not to worry, robert w. We're all here to talk about golf and to learn from each other. And as long as things don't get out of hand, we're completely okay with members discussing books, videos, teachers or anything else that has worked (or not worked) for them.

But there comes a point -- admittedly a very subjective point -- when such discussion crosses the line and becomes profiteering on the considerable effort it has taken (and continues to take) to build our membership base. The same holds true for deliberate attempts to undermine the private lessons and LBG Academies that indirectly support this site.

For example, not long ago, a member posted that he was pleased with what he had learned from the site and was considering traveling to see me personally. Shortly thereafter, a reply post followed (from someone I've never met) with a list of teachers in the member's area, complete with names, addresses and phone numbers, along with the advice that he could save a lot of money by staying home.

Line crossed.

We seek to provide -- for free -- a meaningful experience for all who come here, and in so doing, to promote Lynn Blake Golf. It violates our sense of 'fair play' to have links posted that direct members away from our site. It is particularly vexing when those 'redirects' are recurring as part of a member's signature. At the very least, we consider that tactic bad manners.

In those rare instances we feel action is necessary, we usually address the issue by Private Message. In this instance, our membership beat us to the punch, and so we have responded publicly (and also privately).

Thanks to all who support us and our mission to bring power amd precision to your game. As we approach Member #3,000 in just 18 months of operation, we are delighted with the progress made, but far from satisfied. More, much more, is to come!

[lekommend]

I apologize to all of you.
I am inexperienced for posting in forums.
I just really want to know the advance TGMer prefered swing model which should be the right path, non-struggling way, for everyone to develop into a higher level in a short time.
Again, sorry for blatancy.

[lagster]

I apologize to all of you.
I am inexperienced for posting in forums.
I just really want to know the advance TGMer prefered swing model which should be the right path, non-struggling way, for everyone to develop into a higher level in a short time.
Again, sorry for blatancy.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I don't believe there is one particular MODEL for TGM. Some good traits could be gleaned from looking at certain players...Steve Elkington, for example, has many good things about his technique (Pivot, Impact, Plane).

One way to find a MODEL... is to find a player that has a similar build, tempo, strength level, and flexibility to yourself. Even this, however, does not always work. If you looked at John Daly just walking down the street, you would probably not imagine he could have a long, swinging type action in golf.

The ESSENTIALS and IMPERATIVES should be there, but after that variations can be in one's technique, and probably should be. Find a way that works well under a tournament situation... for you.