Question concerning Accumulator #3??? - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Question concerning Accumulator #3???

The Golfing Machine - Advanced

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-20-2007, 12:38 PM
SECGolf SECGolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Duluth, Georgia
Posts: 110
Question concerning Accumulator #3???
A few quotes from Yoda in the archive:

"For simplicity and greater Power Control, most Short Strokes, especially Putts and Chips, should employ Zero #3"

"Full Strokes, on the other hand, require the greater Power afforded by the #3 Accumulator"

"And here is one final, very important point. The #3 Accumulator is called Transfer Power for a reason: Especially in the Sequenced Release (4-D-0) of Swingers, it transfers the Power of the Released #2 Accumulator (Left Wrist Cock) into the Rolling Left Forearm and Hand."

Why or what makes it so that greater power is afforded by the #3 Accumulator? Other than the transfer of power, is there "independent" power associated with #3? Why couldn't the same amount of power be transferred straight from #2 to the PPs and so on to the ball? Or is it just not practical to think one could transfer full force of #2 to the PPs and so on to the ball with no accommodation by the chosen #3 angle AND still maintain proper alignments? But then I think even with zero #3 there is still the "roll" of a hinge action.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.