ready,fire,aim - Page 2 - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

ready,fire,aim

The Golfing Machine - Basic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-18-2006, 04:20 PM
comdpa's Avatar
comdpa comdpa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 627
Originally Posted by strav
Comdpa
Can't help thinking you are correct especially with the added weight of 6-G-0 "All motion is focused on driving the Hands—NOT THE CLUB—toward the BALL."
Hi strav,

Something for you to think about along these lines...

6-G-0 also mentions that educated hands can compensate for off line hip and shoulder motion but only up to a point.

How do you reconcile this with a "Hand Controlled Pivot" and what we just mentioned about bringing the hands down and out on plane and 5-0?

This will further your understanding of TGM I believe.
__________________
The Singapore Slinger
http://justintanggolf.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-18-2006, 10:32 PM
EdStraker's Avatar
EdStraker EdStraker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: McKinney, TX; San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 115
Originally Posted by comdpa
Mike,

Per 6-M-1, the downstroke sequence is always knees, hips, shoulders, right elbow, left wrist uncocking and / or left hand rotation.

But it is the INTENT of bringing the hands down and out on-plane that will ironically bring about this sequence.

Food for thought - you will hardly see a good tennis player getting out of sync in their strokes. Is it any wonder that they focus only on what their hands are doing?

Its hard for most people to accept this line of reasoning until they play a round of tennis, observe their pivot reacting to the hands and then apply this procedure to their golf stroke.

Amateurs who try to trigger the downstroke in the sequence afore mentioned always manage to get it to fire the other way around.

Which brings to mind Mr. Kelley's timeless words, the hands are not educated until they control the pivot - 9-1

I think many people need to have the pivot trained to some point before they learn hand controlled pivot. The body might not necesarily react to the hands. For example, a student could move the hands toward the ball by moving the arms independent of the body, thus resulting in very little pivot. Once the pivot is learned, then I think it is easier to learn a hand controlled pivot.

I taught tennis through my college days and for a couple of years after graduating. Some of the students with an athletic background could learn "hand controlled" strokes immediately, but many people had to learn the rotation involved with ground strokes first before having a "hand controlled" stroke. If they didn't they would just move the arms from the shoulder and have an arm-only stroke.

Since the arms can be moved from the shoulder sockets without the trunk rotating, it doesn't mean the body will necessarily respond to the hands when first learning the golf swing.

I agree a hand-controlled golf swing is the way to go, but I don't agree that the body will automatically respond correctly to the hand's movement. I think it has to be trained to do this.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-18-2006, 10:35 PM
strav strav is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by comdpa
Hi strav,

Something for you to think about along these lines...

6-G-0 also mentions that educated hands can compensate for off line hip and shoulder motion but only up to a point.

How do you reconcile this with a "Hand Controlled Pivot" and what we just mentioned about bringing the hands down and out on plane and 5-0?

This will further your understanding of TGM I believe.
Comdpa
The answer to your question, I believe, is encapsulated in the Three Zones(9-0) but I will leave it to others more knowledgeable than I for a detailed response which I’m sure as you say will further my understanding of TGM. Thanks for the reply and posing the question.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-19-2006, 04:38 AM
bts's Avatar
bts bts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Posts: 352
Originally Posted by EdStraker
.................
Since the arms can be moved from the shoulder sockets without the trunk rotating, it doesn't mean the body will necessarily respond to the hands when first learning the golf swing.

..................
The trunk is not rotating (or being felt doing nothing) does not necessarily mean it's not doing anything. It appears (to the observor) the body is motionless and doing nothing when pushing against a wall (static muscle contraction).

See for yourself by moving the (lagged) arms "without the trunk rotating" while standing on the ground vs. a rotary chair.
__________________
Yani Tseng, Go! Go! Go!
Yani Tseng Did It Again!
YOU load and sustain the "LAG", during which the "LAW" releases it, ideally beyond impact.
"Sustain (Yang/陽) the lag (Yin/陰)" is "the unification of Ying and Yang" (陰陽合一).
The "LAW" creates the "effect", which is the "motion" or "feel", with the "cause", which is the "intent" or "command".
"Lag" is the secret of golf, passion is the secret of life.
Think as a golfer, execute like a robot.
Rotate, twist, spin, turn.
Bend the shaft.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-19-2006, 07:22 AM
comdpa's Avatar
comdpa comdpa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 627
Originally Posted by bts
The trunk is not rotating (or being felt doing nothing) does not necessarily mean it's not doing anything. It appears (to the observor) the body is motionless and doing nothing when pushing against a wall (static muscle contraction).

See for yourself by moving the (lagged) arms "without the trunk rotating" while standing on the ground vs. a rotary chair.
bts,

What EdStraker is referring to here is the arms moving across the chest (from their point of origin, the shoulders) with no rotary motion of the trunk.

Remember, the shoulders are a dual agent, being part of both the Power Package and the Pivot. Therefore, arm induced shoulder motion does not necessarily mean the Pivot is involved. 7-13
__________________
The Singapore Slinger
http://justintanggolf.blogspot.com

Last edited by comdpa : 02-19-2006 at 07:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-19-2006, 07:44 AM
comdpa's Avatar
comdpa comdpa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 627
Originally Posted by strav
Comdpa
The answer to your question, I believe, is encapsulated in the Three Zones(9-0) but I will leave it to others more knowledgeable than I for a detailed response which I’m sure as you say will further my understanding of TGM. Thanks for the reply and posing the question.

Hi strav,

EdStraker makes a great point.

Yes, the answer is encapsulated in the 3 Zones.

Per 1-L, mastery of the pivot is essential for good golf.
Unless developed in sequence of the 3 zones, one ends up with a weak and compensated game per 9-0.

Instructors who teach only hands or pivot components to the exclusion of the other is only teaching half the golf stroke.

It is vitally essential that the hands and the pivot be trained individually and then control of the entire motion be handed over to the hands.

It is very possible for a player to have offline pivot motion (Bobbing and Swaying per 3-F-7-C/D) and still have the hands making the correct motion.

It is also very possible for the pivot to be making the correct motion and then have the hands spoil it all by Steering (3-F-7-A).

Of course, it is not as simplistic as I explain it. Mr. Kelley certainly solves this problem with his 3 zones.

I just described it in this manner to an AI recently...

The golf stroke is like driving a car. The hands and feet are controlling the car, but it is the engine that is powering the car.

Power flows through the hands and the feet (accelerator control) but power is not of the hands and feet.

In this analogy, the hands and feet relate to the Hands controlling the golf stroke and the engine of the car relates to the Pivot in the golf stroke.

With a student, I will go through Basic, Acquired and then Total Motion.

Within each stage, I deal with the 3 Zones.

For 12-5-1 and 12-5-2, there should be a zeroed out motion, so I teach students what a zeroed motion is, what the Pivot components should be doing (i.e. keep still) for these 2 motions.

For 12-5-3, there will be a Standard Pivot, which means a free turn in both directions. Again, they will be taught what the 6 pivot components ought to be doing etc.

Once a student has gained ample mastery of the pivot, we will move on very rapidly to the other two stages and thereafter pass control of the swing to the hands.

With a Hand Controlled Pivot procedure now, the student now has the benefit of Zone 1 Training to know what the Pivot has to do. When any off line Pivot Motion occurs for any reason, the student has a point of reference that he can now use for correction.

Remember Zone 1 is for balance and not for power, but there can be no power without balance...and thus, it is imperative to keep things in their place...and it is here I also leave you with more food for thought - namely, Pivot or Hands for power?
__________________
The Singapore Slinger
http://justintanggolf.blogspot.com

Last edited by comdpa : 02-19-2006 at 08:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-19-2006, 11:36 AM
6bmike's Avatar
6bmike 6bmike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern New Jersey
Posts: 1,605
I remember Lynn telling it this way:

Z1 ... the pivot- turning of the right shoulder
Z2 ... the lifting of the arms during Z1
Z3 ... The delivery of the hands- the Flying Wedges and pp3
down through the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-19-2006, 11:34 PM
strav strav is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 233
Hogan on power
Originally Posted by comdpa
Pivot or Hands for power?


Ben thought both were involved - and then some.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-20-2006, 02:18 AM
comdpa's Avatar
comdpa comdpa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 627
Originally Posted by strav

Ben thought both were involved - and then some.
Yes strav,

Both are involved when it comes to hitting the ball a mile.

Not to give the impression that I am more knowledgeable than Mr. Hogan, I would disregard some of the things that he says in the caption.

Taking Mr. Hogan's advice to use the right foot to give that "decided push" for more power will trouble amateurs more than help them.

Mr. Kelley in studying Mr. Hogan's book, "Power Golf" disregarded all the "words" and paid attention only to the pictures which were "big and clear"
__________________
The Singapore Slinger
http://justintanggolf.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-24-2006, 11:13 AM
kmmcnabb's Avatar
kmmcnabb kmmcnabb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 139
Big Thanks From Kev
Comdpa and Yoda,

Big thanks on down, out, and forward. Much much clearer now. I was out of my office for a week or so and just got back to read it. Thanks for the help. By the by, ordered the new edition (can't resist) and hope to have it by mid April for a look.
__________________
Kevin

------------------------------------------
Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thanks to everyone - newbie ready to lift the fog mantan The Golfing Machine - Basic 2 04-22-2006 11:50 PM
How much we have to aim behind for bunker shot oztrainee The Golfing Machine - Advanced 6 03-23-2006 10:17 AM
R U Ready 2 Roll? 6bmike The Golfing Machine - Basic 12 12-21-2005 11:39 PM
Getting Ready To Rumble Yoda Three Golf Guy's and You - Woodmont CC 0 07-19-2005 11:51 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.