![]() |
Annikan... You mentioned that Mr. O'Grady has done extensive studies into biomechanics. Do you think this is one of the reasons for his success in teaching and learning about golf swing mechanics?
Do you think his research would be helpful in preventing golf related injuries, and/or training(weights etc.) for golf? |
Annikan,
Thanks for the Keith update, I was able to watch him at Augusta one year and was very impressed with his ball striking, as you mentioned his short game has always seemed a little suspect. I knkd of figured the workout thing had been bogus, weight training in my opinion can be very beneficial for golf when done correctly. Todd |
While I've only been exposed to Mac's ideas at a very minute level, his concept of '45 degrees' is quite solid and something I often find myself coming back to in my own swing experimentation. The simple answer to the grip question IMO is that the left hand grip at 45 degrees is both anatomically, and geometrically in balance - given a right hand that is basically verticle to the plane.
As for Clearwater, yeah, I remember watching him at the 87 Open and I thought he had one of the best swings on tour, great to see him and Purtzer on the range, and the course - I think Keith shot a 64 in the opening round (my memory may be failing me there). I do see what you mean about him coming out of his angles though. |
Re: Mac O'Grady and TGM
Quote:
The reference to REVERSE PIVOT is interesting. Mac likes the way that Hogan and Snead both had a version of a REVERSE PIVOT. Johnny Miller and Jack Nicklaus, I believe, also have some of this in their swings. 10-14-D REVERSE is in TGM. Is this the same move, or is Mac talking about something much different? According to the post, this kind of pivot had something to do with maintaining one's Center of Gravity. What do you think? |
Mac, like Ben prefers a straighten right leg on the backswing.
Like Bobby Jones, Hogan, Jack, Floyd, and others, this straight leg gives the appearance of a reverse pivot but all are merely centered between their legs. |
Lagster,
I would agree with 6bMike. Mac showed us that you won't actually reverse pivot if you get the club going on plane back, in and up on the backswing. However, if you take the club straight back (outside the plane), then at the top you'll probably have a reverse pivot. Bruce |
Quote:
So... it sounds like the takeaway is very important to keeping this pivot in order. You went into this slightly in your first post. |
Quote:
Bruce |
The difference is 'counter fall' - a reverse pivot moves 'center', a 'counter fall' keeps center stable - Similar to Austin's view of the hips/tailbone swinging, with the head/center being stable.
A right anchor keeps the tailbone still (bottom of spine), standard knee keeps the head still (top of spine). Either the 'top swings' or the 'bottom swings'. (keep the hips level - right anchor, or allow the hips to tilt - standard knee action, right leg straightens) Hitter's IMO should use standard action because it really, really helps the crossline hip motion. Despite what is being taught as Austin's approach now (which isn't what I think he really did), I have really grown to appreciate his swing and theories more and more - especially his hip motion. |
Just an observation...
When I, Brian Manzella, The Itallian Stallion, says I like a straight leg SOMETIMES, I get jumped by the peanut gallery. If Mac says it, is AOK. If Ben says it too, it is AOK. Or course if ONLY Me and Ben say it, again the peanut gallery attacks. no? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 AM. |