|
Originally Posted by Bagger Lance
|
|
Originally Posted by Mike O
|
|
On a wider level- if there is interest- the site admins might want to create a "Cross References" category, where cross reference issues / relationships could be discussed.
|
I like it. Would each thread be limited to relationship pairs or even broader?
Bagger
|
I'm sure there are alot of different avenues that you could approach it from. I always thought his cross references were confusing at first- What is exactly the relationship that he is referring to? Sometimes it's something in that section that's rather specific - for example a sentence or two, while other times it may be the whole section, and of course at other times you're still going, what? Huh? Wish I knew what he was thinking! Much like the initial post here, a thread where cross references are discussed as to what they are linking to - specific or broad, and the reason-correlation for the link- was always an interest that I had learning the book, and seemed like a good category of discussion. I envision the posts started as - Why does he have a cross reference to X from section XXXX. Or a post such as: "I'm thinking that the cross reference in X is because of this- any other thoughts?"
Anyway, that was my thought- obviously has to have interest from others and make sense for Lynn and the Admins.
Hybrid Mode
