Oakmont final day thoughts?

U.S. Open - 2007

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-18-2007, 11:32 AM
Seanmx's Avatar
Seanmx Seanmx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 178
Originally Posted by hg View Post
Why doesn't Tiger dominate like he use to ...
I think this time his chipping, pitching and bunker play were not up to his usual high standards.

e.g. The skull/flub combo on 3 is something we have never seen Tiger do before
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-18-2007, 01:36 PM
bambam's Avatar
bambam bambam is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 1,793
Originally Posted by Seanmx View Post
I think this time his chipping, pitching and bunker play were not up to his usual high standards.

e.g. The skull/flub combo on 3 is something we have never seen Tiger do before
Couldn't agree more. I was shocked after #3, and equally as suprised after his bunker shot on 17. After 17's tee shot, I thought the only thing Tiger had to worry about was not bogying 18.
__________________
Ben
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-19-2007, 02:36 AM
Seanmx's Avatar
Seanmx Seanmx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 178
Bunker Shot in 17
Originally Posted by bambam View Post
Couldn't agree more. I was shocked after #3, and equally as suprised after his bunker shot on 17. After 17's tee shot, I thought the only thing Tiger had to worry about was not bogying 18.
I think in his defense on the bunker shot on 17 there was a stone under the ball which took all the spin away
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-19-2007, 08:14 AM
12 piece bucket's Avatar
12 piece bucket 12 piece bucket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
I don't get it. If the best players in the world are averaging 77 or whatever on a golf course . . . something is afoul. What's the big deal about them making a birdie. The USGA is selfabsorbed. Tweeking these old courses to "protect" them and par is like putting a mustashe on the mona lisa. It's not golf. The guys at the Masters are doing the same thing. Bobby Jones wouldn't recognize his golf course.
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand

Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-19-2007, 09:08 AM
bambam's Avatar
bambam bambam is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 1,793
Is this course that much different than it was in the past? They said the 300 yard par 3 was about 250 yards back in 1920something. How many guys back then could hit that green w/ hickory clubs and the golf ball of that day? I bet it was significantly less than the number of players who could reach the current par three using less than driver. It sounded to me like the changes at Oakmont have made that course more like it was in the past...of course, I have no idea what it was like in the past, so I have to take their word for it
__________________
Ben
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-19-2007, 09:35 AM
asleep asleep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 78
Competitive golf is played mainly on a five-and-a-half-inch course...the space between your ears.--Bobby Jones.

It was interesting to see the best of the best severely tested and observe how the reacted under such pressure. Final day got everyone. Tiger and Furyk skulled shots from the short grass...wow! Three musketeers: Casey, Rose, Baddeley had good showings up to Sunday, I thought. Anthony Kim continued to impress me with his final round 67. Stephen Ames "plays" golf and is fun to watch---ditto David Toms. I still feel Furyk made a strategic error on 17th even after hearing his explanation.

Surprise of the Open: Remove two holes where he completely lost his composure (9th on Saturday, 1st on Sunday) and your 2007 US Open champion is.....

Bubba Watson!

Last edited by asleep : 06-19-2007 at 11:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-19-2007, 10:00 AM
danny_shank danny_shank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 113
I was very pleased to see Angel win he seems a very nice guy who's not a natural winner. I've watched many pros play and haven't seen a better striker of a golf ball yet. It's good to see he's not going to be an unforfilled talent.

It was also fun watching a player display his emotions in a major. The difference between his demeanor and Tiger's and Furyk's stoic game faces reminded me of the Ryder Cup.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-19-2007, 10:47 AM
Seanmx's Avatar
Seanmx Seanmx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 178
Originally Posted by asleep View Post
[i]
Surprise of the Open: Remove two holes where he completely lost his composure (9th on Saturday, 1st on Sunday) and your 2007 US Open champion is.....

Bubba Watson!
Excellent point
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-19-2007, 11:27 PM
mrodock mrodock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 581
The US Open should reward great shots, slightly penalize good shots, and severely penalize bad shots.
__________________
"In my experience, if you stay with the essentials you WILL build a repeatable swing undoubtedly. If you can master the Imperatives you have a champion" (Vikram).

The reason you can't sustain the lag is because you are so eager to make the club move fast (a reaction to the intent of "hitting it far"). So on a full shot you throw it away too early, which doesn't happen for your short chip. (bts)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-19-2007, 09:25 AM
Seanmx's Avatar
Seanmx Seanmx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 178
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket View Post
I don't get it. If the best players in the world are averaging 77 or whatever on a golf course . . . something is afoul. What's the big deal about them making a birdie. The USGA is selfabsorbed. Tweeking these old courses to "protect" them and par is like putting a mustashe on the mona lisa. It's not golf. The guys at the Masters are doing the same thing. Bobby Jones wouldn't recognize his golf course.
From what I have read I don't think the USGA had to do much to Oakmont other than cut the rough and slow down the greens!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.