I find it much easier to achieve a good rhythm on a lower plane. In the short game I sometimes go even lower. Very un-TGM like but it works pretty well for me.
That's probably it. I was also thinking it would be a way to go to make it easier to the rid of a OTT move?
yes Air i think that is a valid obsevation, i would say it is harder to go OTT from a flatter plane - there is probably a good thread relating to that somewhere on LBG - where you would get better input than mine
interesting vid Air, espec the bit about kids taking the club inside because it is heavy for them & then looping towards the plane line but still finding an attack/approach angle that brings them inside the ball not OTT
you might search for attack angle or approach angle threads & see where it leads ?
interesting vid Air, espec the bit about kids taking the club inside because it is heavy for them & then looping towards the plane line but still finding an attack/approach angle that brings them inside the ball not OTT
you might search for attack angle or approach angle threads & see where it leads ?
i may do the same later & we can compare notes
I'll have to do the first or the last of these 3 - don't think I can do the one plane swing..?
I thought McLean demonstrated the movement down to the ball - just as much as a postion - and he showed 3 different ways to do it. No harm in that?
position golf is usually vague & TGM is precise, position golf just tends to say get here here & here & everything will be alright but there is usually no depth to the instruction & in my experience it doesn't help a great deal - HK said something to the tune of ''by making the golf swing simple you don't make it easier you just make it incomplete & it is easier to understand something complex than something mysterious & incomplete''
i believe the answer to not coming OTT probably lies in improved zone 1 (body) movements
Daryl or someone else might clarify, expand or (more likely) correct (my understanding is very limited as you know)
Linear Mode
