You want me to:
1) Not quote the book.
2) And you want me to give you references at the same time.
The reason is that you want some real references. So references from the book are fake and unsubstantiated?
I will quote myself again: "The same compression point cannot be maintained during the Impact Interval when using Angled Hinging."
Disagree? Maybe someone with more authority, such as Yoda, can help.
I hope I am not taking you post wrong, but yes something as a reference other than the book. Its based on science, so in attempting to see it, where is it in another reference is my question.
I don't beleive I stated the book was a fake but clearly you are unable based on your response to substantiate it other than with use of the book.
If you were to put a dot on your club face and strike the ball using angled hinging, when you retrieved the ball what would you expect to see? With vertical? With Horizontal? Would the club's loft change the results? Will the ball actually move up the face changing the point of impact to point of separation?
This is somewhat of a subset of the question I have in that the role hinging plays on substaining the line of compression vs other components and their variations.
Assuming all is as stated, then what compensation does a hitter have to do in order to substain the line of compression when using Angled Hinging vs say Horizontal?
Threaded Mode
