Stationary Head - To be or not to be

[birdie_man]

Are you suggesting that the golf swing hasn't been studied by plenty of book authors and such for many decades?

Heck no. So....have "they" come to the same conclusions as you seem to have?

Forgive me for not citing specific examples, it was a general statement. You can use a photo or sequence to argue ANY point whatsoever.

No big deal.

Fair enough....I just said for any given golfer you need to look at more than one sequence and more than on shot type and with different clubs in hand. Fair, no?

That's what I love about TGM, the golfer pictures inside only demonstrate the alignments and not 'this is how ____ does it'.

That is well and good as one facet of things. "How _____ does it" should hold some ground tho.

Not the end, just the best to date IMO.

It IS the best to date.

This thread seems to have run it's course, and I don't want to see us lower our standards here. Please either edit your posts regarding other instructors or delete them.

The ridiculous, false, and slanderous insinuations continue on the other forum, but we have put that entire organization on permanent "ignore". I would ask that friends of LBG do the same.

What's been done is forever behind us now and there is no looking back.

Thanks

You are 100% right Bagger.

There's no need to get into this...

I mean....honestly, when certain things are brought up I find it very very hard not to respond...

....but I do realize we're at the point where the thread can turn into to a crap-throwing contest. (or at least a pointless argument that has no place on a forum dedicated to golf instruction)

And frankly I feel like I should respond to those last few posts (and can easily) but I will refrain.

I'd rather talk about golf than shift the topic to something else anyway.