LynnBlakeGolf Forums

LynnBlakeGolf Forums (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/index.php)
-   The Lab (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Bio Mechanics (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6722)

Daryl 08-11-2009 09:11 PM

No_Mind,

Relax. You're using Ayn Rand? Got any hang-ups?

Weetbix 08-11-2009 09:20 PM

no mind indeed
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by no_mind_golfer (Post 66873)
There is no energy stored when muscles are stretched. Muscles contract... thats what they do. When muscles contract they apply forces to levers (the human skeleton) which cause movement. Thats all.

Muscles contract (apply force) to levers... thats it! Thats what muscles do.

Geez you make it sound so simple. Muscles contract and apply force to levers. But like most things it isn't that simple. Muscles require chemical reactions to contract. They can contract in many different ways - different speeds, different levels of power, different lengths. They are also connected to ligaments which react differently depending on the amount of tension they are under.

And I am sure I don't need to tell you about potential energy in a kinetic system, and that the sorts of actions biomechanic is talking about create and release potential energy, converting it into kinetic energy through a chemical reaction, initiated by an electrical impulse. Newton would have no concerns that in creating a level of stretch between two points connected my muscular tissue that this creates a level of potential energy that is released and realised when the muscles contract.

BTW this is in the same class as Homer teaches whereby the four power accumulators store potential energy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by no_mind_golfer (Post 66873)
Sure Angular momentum "applies" in golf.... But Angular Momentum sure as heck is not CONSERVED in the golf swing (for the reasons I've already stated several times now). If angular momentum were being conserved in golf as a theoretical golfer spun about his/her theoretical spine axis then as the club moved away from the body.... THE ROTATION OF THE SYSTEM WOULD SLOW DOWN. COAM dictates that an Increase the moment of inertia must be accompanied by a rotational speed decrease. Everyone knows that does not happen. Everyone knows the club angular velocity speeds up as it releases and Nesbits data proves not everyones (probably darn few) hands slow down prior to impact. COAM like COM in describing the golf swing is a MYTH (one of many btw).

I'm saying what you have written in this thread is wrong.... Don't go trying to drag other's to your defense. That is a blatant logical fallacy (appeal to popularity)... in this case a popular misconception.

Like using Nesbit's research? Like saying "Everyone knows"? Angular momentum can be conserved in the sense that it isn't wasted. An example is the need to create and sustain Lag. What biomechanic is teaching is how to conserve the momentum and not allow it to dissipate early so that as much of what you generate when you push against the ground can be applied to the ball. What is important to remember is that the only energy (and kinetic energy (like momentum) is energy) you can generate to power your swing comes from you pushing against the ground. The conservation comes in getting as much of that energy into the ball to send it on its way. There is no other energy available because every action has an equal and opposite reaction and all of that opposite reaction for your golf swing either goes into the ground or is wasted (at least in the sense of maximising clubhead speed) as two parts of your body act in opposition.

Every golfer wastes the energy that is created when they push against the ground. biomechanic trains you to waste less of it. And that's the sort of conservation that I want in my swing.


Quote:

Originally Posted by no_mind_golfer (Post 66873)
YOU SHOULD CARE ABOUT THEORY! Let me tell you a true story. There was once a project to which a young Engineering graduate was assigned. They had a pit of water about 60 feet deep that need to be drained so construction could begin.... The forman on the job had a lot of "practical" experience and ordered that a certain pump be used. The young engineer took one look at the pump and said it would not work. The forman was an arrogant man who thought he knew more that some young punk engineer fresh out of school with nothing but some "book learnin". In the end the engineer was proven right... Even though it was a very big pump it did not work. do you know why? Anybody? "Theory" tells us why.

Bio.... Your words sound nice ... very benevolent... But I believe Ayn Rand has you pegged... you're in it for selfish purposes... All business' are in it to make money. Again... I'm listening... WHERE IS THE BEEF?

biomechanic did not say that the theory did not matter - he said that he didn't care about it because the theories that his work is based on have been tested and demonstrated to be effective (that's what it means when he says that In our field you don't last long in the game if your theories are flawed and don't get results. Taking words out of context is another of those logical fallacies:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wikipedia
The practice of quoting out of context, sometimes referred to as "contextomy" or "quote mining", is a logical fallacy and type of false attribution in which a passage is removed from its surrounding matter in such a way as to distort its intended meaning.

To criticise someone in business because they want to make money is not reasonable. Lynn and Ted make money out of golf - are you criticising them because they post here? Because they set up a forum to "suck us in? And if you think I am here just to support biomechanic, I became a member here before I ever even knew he existed. However he has helped my game, so I am happy to share what I've experienced. I've seen a little of the research and unique tools that biomechanic has. I know some of the background of the people he works with. And I am seeing the results in the air and on the scorecard.

And I have seen the numbers that show how the different parts of my body accelarate and decelarate through the swing. And I have seen the numbers for a world number one golfer, renowned as possibly the best ballstriker ever. Not numbers from video pinched off the net. Numbers from a screening exactly the same as I got. I can see the accelaration of body parts and the clubshaft and the clubhead. I can see the decelaration (and yes Daryl, they decelarate after they pass line of sight). Biomechanic was able to show me exactly where I was throwing it away. How my bosy was trying to support a swing that was basically all arms. And his exercises have changed that enormously since then. Now I compress instead of scoop. Now I pivot to drive the swing instead of just to give my arms some support while they try and do all the work. Now I don't come away from the golf course or range with painful hips and back for days.

That is why biomechanic says that he doesn't care about the theory. He's not here to educate you on why this stuff works. He's here to say that he has a way that will improve your zones (not just your pivot), imrpove your power delivery, and will make you a healthier golfer.

I'm glad I listened.

12 piece bucket 08-11-2009 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 66866)
Bucket,

Why be such a tight ass?

Nice one! That was for Mikey!

Daryl 08-11-2009 10:11 PM

Bioengine,

Question:

I'm really curious and you probably know the answer.

Lets say a Golfer weighs 180 lbs.
  1. What is the typical MAXIMUM ground pressure he creates during the swing?
  2. Approximately when in the Downstroke does this occur?

O.B.Left 08-11-2009 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Weetbix (Post 66834)
I will add a proviso that all of these are taken without a ball, just practice swings. I have no idea how much this changes when I'm actually addressing a ball.
]



The ball changes everything. One of Homers biggest revelations and the basis of much of his theory. He didnt steer dandelions in his yard but he did when confronted by a golf ball. Steering and Throw Away. I look like George Knudson in my yard........if only I could look that way in the presence of a ball. I have hundreds of video examples to prove it. Pathetic though they are.

Homers advice , obtuse though it was, is very practical.

Cheers.

bioengine 08-12-2009 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 66879)
Bioengine,

Question:

I'm really curious and you probably know the answer.

Lets say a Golfer weighs 180 lbs.
  1. What is the typical MAXIMUM ground pressure he creates during the swing?
  2. Approximately when in the Downstroke does this occur?

Daryl,
Here is the mis conception about pressure plates. Weight has nothing to do with pressure plates.
Allow me to explain.
You have two forces normal force , which is your force going into the ground,This is your centre of mass (weight).

Then you have shear forces working along the surface of the ground. Left foot forces, one is away from your left towards the target.the second is away from your toes.
Right foot one force is away from the right foot,away from the target and the second is from your right heal.

It's all about how your press into your left side to create ground reaction forces.The ability to press into your left side and foot and how well you do this is what creates an equal and opposite force reaction. The equal and opposite force reaction creates lower body stabilization and creates hip rotation cause your hips to turn left. The continuation of pressing in to your left side and also create stabilizing at impact and create hip deceleration. This allows your upper body to close.

Predominately during the back swing good players with good lower body mechanics,centre of mass starts to press into their left side during their backswing.

It's not about transfering weight this is a myth. It's your centre of mass moving into your left side and the ability to press into your left side.
When people see pressure plate data and see pressure is moving to the left side they mistake this these forces being their weight.
Not weight it's forces.
So what happens every tries to transfer the weight. Not good.

To achieve this your have to train your body how to create ground forces. We have done researching trying to physically trying to do it and we can't make it happen.

O.B.Left 08-12-2009 12:20 AM

Left , Right, Left, Right. Im going to ground force my way into the kitchen and get me another Molson.

Dont take this the wrong way though Bio. I do agree, basic though it is, it is the basis of golf motion. You cant pivot around a non loaded leg. Gotta get off the back foot. Dont hang back. Post up. Hit against a Firm left side etc etc.

Left, right, left , right , left , right

Weetbix 08-12-2009 02:29 AM

fo shiz
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by O.B.Left (Post 66891)
The ball changes everything. One of Homers biggest revelations and the basis of much of his theory. He didnt steer dandelions in his yard but he did when confronted by a golf ball. Steering and Throw Away. I look like George Knudson in my yard........if only I could look that way in the presence of a ball. I have hundreds of video examples to prove it. Pathetic though they are.

Homers advice , obtuse though it was, is very practical.

Cheers.

Yeah OB, couldn't agree more - that was my thought behind the proviso.

I first discovered TGM and G.O.L.F. at ISeekGolf.com in Australia (my home). And what I discovered was wonderful. A terminology that was so much more precise. Some clear imperitives and why they are so important. And lots of information about how there are many many ways to hit a golf ball and the only difference between them is that some are generally more effective at lowering your score than others (if you get what I mean). I really like the concept of learning feel from mechanics and then repeating the feel to create the mechanics. But I found that it took me a lot of time, and that it was very easy to lose it again. And I struggle for the time.

I also am not a natural when it comes to golf. I probably played my first game at 12. I'm now 38. It took me until I was about 26 to break 100. Then after going to the range and getting lessons I finally broke 90 about 6 years ago. And I've plateau'd since then.

When bioengine first introduced me to what he did I was wary, because lets face it there is barely a web site you can get on to these days that doesn't have an ad saying "This is the secret to golf". But I asked lots of questions and he showed me what he did on a web conference. And where it spoke to me is that it said there is an optimal way for your body to work to swing a tool hard - golf club, tennis racquet, baseball bat, axe, whatever. There are ways that consistently deliver power in a way that moves the ball the way you want it to. And I thought that this was at least partly a reason why some people are just good at sports - because they have a good kinetic link. You know, there are people who go out and their first round they hit 95.

So I know that I am not one of those people. Never been a natural at any sport. Golf was no exception (as you can see from my stats above). So here is someone saying they can analyse my movement patterns AND give me specific exercises to improve mine. And they are working. I don't know why. Some of them are, as bioengine calls them "silly little exercises". But today I completed them in about 25 minutes. I should do them 3 times a week, but I generally only do them twice. And three days ago I hit 9 out of 13 fairways and hit 8 GIR and another 4 that were just off. And I would have hit at least 5 drives that were 20-30 metres longer than my norm - 240-250m instead of 210-220m.

So I'm very happy with results so far - after only 10 weeks!

Weetbix 08-12-2009 06:24 AM

anybody?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Weetbix (Post 66834)
I've uploaded a video I took in my backyard on 1 July, and then another tonight. There are already shots from April so that will give you something to compare against.

The 1 July 09 shots were after doing about a month of PST. Tonight would be about 2 and a half months, I estimate about 20 sessions which would take about 30 minutes each.

Actually I'll be interested myself in having a look - as I've said I have no pattern that I'm working towards, this stuff has just come out of the exercises.

I will add a proviso that all of these are taken without a ball, just practice swings. I have no idea how much this changes when I'm actually addressing a ball.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6CNJIhwWB8

Anybody got any thoughts?

golfguru 08-12-2009 06:53 AM

Most who practice to not hit the deck will do struggle to make low point when it counts.

Not saying you do not. Beware ingrained practice is hard to shift unless its correct practice of ball striking routines.

If you did this on grass, I assume the club would be "divoting".

Weetbix 08-12-2009 07:40 AM

divots r us!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by golfguru (Post 66903)
Most who practice to not hit the deck will do struggle to make low point when it counts.

Not saying you do not. Beware ingrained practice is hard to shift unless its correct practice of ball striking routines.

If you did this on grass, I assume the club would be "divoting".

Yeah, no problems with getting down and creating divots these days. I was only hovering that high to avoid smashing the club into the pavers (as I'm sure you figured). On the course my problem was the opposite! Actually took some divots with my driver before hitting the ball! Nothing deep, and wasn't losing much distance, surprisingly. But I could see a strip before the tee on a couple of drives. I've been resting the driver on the ground but might need to start hovering it to start at the right height.

GPStyles 08-12-2009 07:58 AM

Chuck Evans: Years ago, when we first met, I was in Moe’s group playing in a tournament in the Florida “winter tour series”. After playing together in a couple of these events I said to Moe, “teach me how to swing like you”. He replied, “swing like you, not like Moe”.

It took me a few years to fully comprehend what he meant. I first thought he was politely telling me to take a hike and go figure it out for myself, then I realised that what he actually meant, was no one can completely duplicate the motion of another player. We all have certain restrictions in our strokes and what one player can do physically or mentally another player may not.

This is evident today with teachers attempting to teach Moe’s procedure. There have been no players to date that have had the success of Moe Norman! There are no players that have won any tour events using Moe’s procedure because they cannot duplicate precisely what he did. There are players that say they use Moe’s procedure but none of them actually do. They use variations of what they think Moe did.

People have tried to emulate Hogan, Nicklaus, Tiger, Snead, Nelson, and a host of others but they will all fail. The only way a player can exactly duplicate another player is to have:

The same physical structure and flexibility
The same mind set
The same personality style


This surely relates to biomechanics and the notion that there is a 'best way' for all of us to golf our ball.

Weetbix 08-12-2009 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPStyles (Post 66907)
Chuck Evans: Years ago, when we first met, I was in Moe’s group playing in a tournament in the Florida “winter tour series”. After playing together in a couple of these events I said to Moe, “teach me how to swing like you”. He replied, “swing like you, not like Moe”.

It took me a few years to fully comprehend what he meant. I first thought he was politely telling me to take a hike and go figure it out for myself, then I realised that what he actually meant, was no one can completely duplicate the motion of another player. We all have certain restrictions in our strokes and what one player can do physically or mentally another player may not.

This is evident today with teachers attempting to teach Moe’s procedure. There have been no players to date that have had the success of Moe Norman! There are no players that have won any tour events using Moe’s procedure because they cannot duplicate precisely what he did. There are players that say they use Moe’s procedure but none of them actually do. They use variations of what they think Moe did.

People have tried to emulate Hogan, Nicklaus, Tiger, Snead, Nelson, and a host of others but they will all fail. The only way a player can exactly duplicate another player is to have:

The same physical structure and flexibility
The same mind set
The same personality style


This surely relates to biomechanics and the notion that there is a 'best way' for all of us to golf our ball.

I think bioengine said somewhere earlier in the thread that when they screen top ball strikers they all have very similar biomechanics, even though their swings are very very different. The training I have received has absolutely nothing like a swing pattern to aim for. You do the exercises and they train the body to move more efficiently. For one person that might look like Jack, another like Hogan, another like Trevino, and another like Moe. But actually everyone will just look like themselves. There is literally nothing like a visual pattern. bioengine has said to me that visually he cannot assess people's biomchanics. There is no "look", no series of positions, no specific planes, no specific set up rules, no nothing. In fact bioengine made me promise that when I swing I am not allowed to think about "doing" anything. His recommendation is simply to have a visual of the result you want. Sometimes I cheat and just focus on a spot on the back of the ball because I am not good at visualisation yet.

I think what I am doing based on biomechanics fits exactly with what Moe said. You do these exercises and then you go out and just let your body hit it the way it wants to.

Weetbix 08-12-2009 09:08 AM

sorry
 
I am sorry if I am coming across like a salesman. I will catagorically state that I don't work for bioengine, we have no business or personal arrangements or kickbacks. Our only relationship is that I have paid to be screened and have a personal tarining regime supplied.

I'd never heard of biomechanics before, so maybe that helped because I didn't have any preconceptions. I would be amazed if in a fairly new field in such a complicated area that there wern't failures. Overpromising and underdelivering. People with dubious qualifications selling snake oil.

All I can say with my relationship with bioengine and the business he is a part of to date is that the results have been there for me to see, and for the people who I play golf with to see. bioengine has backed up what he's told me. He has been open with information and time to show me what it is he does and why what he does works.

Why I've responded to many of the questions raised here is twofold: one because it has helped me, and I know how frustrating golf can be, so I hope that people will investigate and find out if this can help them. I don't know what it's like in the US but bioengine has been prepared to show me why he's worth my investment. Of course it was still a risk because I'd never heard of anyone who has benefitted. I have since!

Second is because many of the questions and comments have seemed to me to be based on assumptions about what bioengine is selling and not what he really has to offer. Styles - I know you on another forum so I hope you know me well enough to believe that I was not having a go at you in my previous post. I think that when you heard "best way" you assumed things - maybe previous experiences with position golf stuff, or other "My pattern is better than your pattern" stuff. But bioengine has always said to me that what he teaches doesn't take away the need for TGM or golf pro teachers. But there are aspects of people's golf that his training is better able to help than traditional methods. For example, I have heard of drills where you try and have the feeling of skipping a stone. I suspect that this is trying to tap into our natural biomechanics and apply them to the golf swing. bioengine would say that he can help us go beyond tapping into our natural biomechanics and actually help us to improve them. Then when we apply them to the golf swing we get a better result. Golfguru has uses the analogy of throwing a ball many times. This is tapping into our natural athletic ability. bioengine's training will probably help me to be better at throwing a ball. And if I can bring that to my golf swing I will also have a better swing.

Not sure how much sense that made. But all I can do is try ... It would help if I could learn to say something with less words!:)

12 piece bucket 08-12-2009 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bioengine (Post 66893)
Daryl,
Here is the mis conception about pressure plates. Weight has nothing to do with pressure plates.
Allow me to explain.
You have two forces normal force , which is your force going into the ground,This is your centre of mass (weight).

Then you have shear forces working along the surface of the ground. Left foot forces, one is away from your left towards the target.the second is away from your toes.
Right foot one force is away from the right foot,away from the target and the second is from your right heal.

It's all about how your press into your left side to create ground reaction forces.The ability to press into your left side and foot and how well you do this is what creates an equal and opposite force reaction. The equal and opposite force reaction creates lower body stabilization and creates hip rotation cause your hips to turn left. The continuation of pressing in to your left side and also create stabilizing at impact and create hip deceleration. This allows your upper body to close.

Predominately during the back swing good players with good lower body mechanics,centre of mass starts to press into their left side during their backswing.

It's not about transfering weight this is a myth. It's your centre of mass moving into your left side and the ability to press into your left side.

When people see pressure plate data and see pressure is moving to the left side they mistake this these forces being their weight.
Not weight it's forces.
So what happens every tries to transfer the weight. Not good.

To achieve this your have to train your body how to create ground forces. We have done researching trying to physically trying to do it and we can't make it happen.


Good stuff here . . . . Very nice . . . . now the question is how and how much . . . Does the shoulder tilt have anything to do with how much you press forward?

Good post . . . comentary on the pics is welcome.





Check the left knee in this sequence . . .



He didn't do it anything like he demonstrated . . . check the tilt in the shoulders . . . if he actually did this you'da never heard of him . . . course maybe that's what he did before the secret? Compare the shoulders in the pics above this . . . WAY DIFFERENT.



Maybe one of the best Hogan pics I've seen . . . AWESOME. Check out the #3 angle and the clubface . . . BEAUTIFUL!!!!


Daryl 08-12-2009 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Weetbix (Post 66902)
Anybody got any thoughts?

Weetbix,

You're going to hurt yourself swinging that way.

No Pivot. Zone 1 not functional. You're not Balanced.

"Work" should be done with the Lower Body and Core Muscles.

It's like riding a Bicycle. Legs do the work (feet, knees, Hips) arms and hands direct.

Shoulders are simultaneously part of the Pivot and Power Package. The Right Shoulder is Thrown by the Pivot.

Learn Zone 1 Separately. Learn Zone 2&3 Separately.

“Reverse every natural instinct and do the opposite of what you are inclined to do, and you will probably come very close to having a perfect golf swing.” Ben Hogan.

Hit the Ball with your Feet.

Weetbix 08-12-2009 09:43 AM

thanks
 
Thanks Daryl

Seems like you an bioengine agree on something! That is my before shot and your points and bio's line up. There is another video called something like Practice Swing - 110809 (in Oz we go day/month/year not month/day/year like the US so 110809 was 11 August 09) which is where I am after abot 10 weeks of PST. Someone asked for a before and after so I linked to the before, and then people will either see the after in the list at the side or can link back to my homepage and find the after.

My PST exercises have been aimed (to the best of my understanding) at creating proper lower body action and driving the swing from the ground up around a stable spine. I'm no expert but I think the new swing is much better from that perspective - certainly from "inside" I can really feel how my lower body is starting the downswing and supplying the effort - in fact it feels like my lower body starts well before my arms have finished going back.

Daryl 08-12-2009 10:06 AM

From Oz? Are both you and Bio from Oz? Golfguru is from Oz. Does anybody know "Tony" : "Ozgolfer" ? I think he's from Perth. One of the best guys I've ever met. I haven't heard from him in awhile.

Weetbix,

I've viewed all of them. No improvement. Sorry. You just don't understand the Pivot.

GPStyles 08-12-2009 11:03 AM

can admin fix the pictures?

I'm having trouble reading the posts

:salut:

Daryl 08-12-2009 11:18 AM

GPStyles,

That's Bucket. I swear, sometimes he's clueless. :laughing9

no_mind_golfer 08-12-2009 03:08 PM

Weebtix... like bio (your alter ego) YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. Quite literally you GOT IT ALL WRONG... every bit of it. Your post demonstrates you know absolutely nothing about mechanics. That said I'm glad you've found a placebo that is working for you this week and wish you the best.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Weetbix (Post 66875)
Geez you make it sound so simple. Muscles contract and apply force to levers. But like most things it isn't that simple. Muscles require chemical reactions to contract. They can contract in many different ways - different speeds, different levels of power, different lengths. They are also connected to ligaments which react differently depending on the amount of tension they are under.

And I am sure I don't need to tell you about potential energy in a kinetic system, and that the sorts of actions biomechanic is talking about create and release potential energy, converting it into kinetic energy through a chemical reaction, initiated by an electrical impulse. Newton would have no concerns that in creating a level of stretch between two points connected my muscular tissue that this creates a level of potential energy that is released and realised when the muscles contract.

BTW this is in the same class as Homer teaches whereby the four power accumulators store potential energy.



Like using Nesbit's research? Like saying "Everyone knows"? Angular momentum can be conserved in the sense that it isn't wasted. An example is the need to create and sustain Lag. What biomechanic is teaching is how to conserve the momentum and not allow it to dissipate early so that as much of what you generate when you push against the ground can be applied to the ball. What is important to remember is that the only energy (and kinetic energy (like momentum) is energy) you can generate to power your swing comes from you pushing against the ground. The conservation comes in getting as much of that energy into the ball to send it on its way. There is no other energy available because every action has an equal and opposite reaction and all of that opposite reaction for your golf swing either goes into the ground or is wasted (at least in the sense of maximising clubhead speed) as two parts of your body act in opposition.

Every golfer wastes the energy that is created when they push against the ground. biomechanic trains you to waste less of it. And that's the sort of conservation that I want in my swing.




biomechanic did not say that the theory did not matter - he said that he didn't care about it because the theories that his work is based on have been tested and demonstrated to be effective (that's what it means when he says that In our field you don't last long in the game if your theories are flawed and don't get results. Taking words out of context is another of those logical fallacies:


To criticise someone in business because they want to make money is not reasonable. Lynn and Ted make money out of golf - are you criticising them because they post here? Because they set up a forum to "suck us in? And if you think I am here just to support biomechanic, I became a member here before I ever even knew he existed. However he has helped my game, so I am happy to share what I've experienced. I've seen a little of the research and unique tools that biomechanic has. I know some of the background of the people he works with. And I am seeing the results in the air and on the scorecard.

And I have seen the numbers that show how the different parts of my body accelarate and decelarate through the swing. And I have seen the numbers for a world number one golfer, renowned as possibly the best ballstriker ever. Not numbers from video pinched off the net. Numbers from a screening exactly the same as I got. I can see the accelaration of body parts and the clubshaft and the clubhead. I can see the decelaration (and yes Daryl, they decelarate after they pass line of sight). Biomechanic was able to show me exactly where I was throwing it away. How my bosy was trying to support a swing that was basically all arms. And his exercises have changed that enormously since then. Now I compress instead of scoop. Now I pivot to drive the swing instead of just to give my arms some support while they try and do all the work. Now I don't come away from the golf course or range with painful hips and back for days.

That is why biomechanic says that he doesn't care about the theory. He's not here to educate you on why this stuff works. He's here to say that he has a way that will improve your zones (not just your pivot), imrpove your power delivery, and will make you a healthier golfer.

I'm glad I listened.


no_mind_golfer 08-12-2009 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Weetbix (Post 66902)
Anybody got any thoughts?

Is this a joke? :laughing9

no_mind_golfer 08-12-2009 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 66874)
No_Mind,

Relax. You're using Ayn Rand? Got any hang-ups?

WTF are you talking about? Do you even know who she is or what she believed?

no_mind_golfer 08-12-2009 03:24 PM

On "potential
 
Muscles are not bungee cords. They don't "STORE" energy when stretched. The only potential energy in the golf swing is owing to gravity and the distance height the club/arms have to fall.

Daryl 08-12-2009 05:02 PM

No_Mind, you're a psychopath. Ask your Doctor to increase your Haloperidol dosage.

no_mind_golfer 08-12-2009 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 66933)
No_Mind, you're a psychopath. Ask your Doctor to increase your Haloperidol dosage.

I take that as a NO which isn't the least bit surprising having suffered your vapid narcissistic posts these past few week.

Daryl 08-12-2009 06:03 PM

Fine, I'll quit posting. It's no longer worth my time when there's a psychopath involved. But seriously, you need professional psychiatric help.

O.B.Left 08-12-2009 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by no_mind_golfer (Post 66936)
I take that as a NO which isn't the least bit surprising having suffered your vapid narcissistic posts these past few week.


Its been WAY longer than that for the rest of us. He is like so vapid. Rip into him.

no_mind_golfer 08-12-2009 06:10 PM

Yah right...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 66938)
Fine, I'll quit posting. It's no longer worth my time when there's a psychopath involved. But seriously, you need professional psychiatric help.

That will be the day... You're an addict... You CAN'T quit posting. Google Narcissistic personality disorder to learn why.

O.B.Left 08-12-2009 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by no_mind_golfer (Post 66940)
That will be the day... You're an addict... You CAN'T quit posting. Google Narcissistic personality disorder to learn why.



Its more like quitting the Mob. D cant quit, "he knows too much".

12 piece bucket 08-12-2009 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 66933)
No_Mind, you're a psychopath. Ask your Doctor to increase your Haloperidol dosage.

Or you could just call Mike O.

12 piece bucket 08-12-2009 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by no_mind_golfer (Post 66940)
That will be the day... You're an addict... You CAN'T quit posting. Google Narcissistic personality disorder to learn why.

Come on man . . . don't pay him no attention . . . stick to physics . . . a team of pysch docs couldn't straighten D out . . . His only chance is a visit from Mikey . . . sometimes that goes good . . . sometimes not so good.

stinkler 08-12-2009 07:14 PM

Hey No Mind, the energy that weetbix is talking about is not bungi cord type stretched energy. You are obviously correct that muscles do not work like that at all. Muscles do work however, and those muscles when contracted create energy, how else could you get the ball past the Womens tee? Assuming you can that is?
It would be nice if things were read a little more carefully and there was some patience in understanding here, sometimes it's hard for people to clearly explain their ideas in words on a forum. The aggressiveness that is coming from you is not helpful at all in this discussion of ideas. Please remember Weetbix and I are students of the game trying to learn and here to do just that. Learning requires questioning and patience, not abuse and yelling.

Mike O 08-12-2009 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by no_mind_golfer (Post 66940)
That will be the day... You're an addict... You CAN'T quit posting. Google Narcissistic personality disorder to learn why.

Addiction, Drugs, Doctors, Psycho's, 12 piece bucket - Damn, you guys are making it nearly impossible for me not join in this thread! :happy3: If they let me out of these tie downs on ward 5, I'll have the time to join you guys- in my current condition - just typing this short post with my tongue took 5hours (I think the guy before me on the keyboard was eating a peanut butter sandwich).

12 piece bucket 08-12-2009 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike O (Post 66956)
Addiction, Drugs, Doctors, Psycho's, 12 piece bucket - Damn, you guys are making it nearly impossible for me not join in this thread! :happy3: If they let me out of these tie downs on ward 5, I'll have the time to join you guys- in my current condition - just typing this short post with my tongue took 5hours (I think the guy before me on the keyboard was eating a peanut butter sandwich).

Who wants to bet that that wasn't no peanut butter on the keyboard . . . . the soap on the rope goes on your neck not around your wrists you doofus . . .

GPStyles 08-13-2009 05:58 AM

very aggressive posts no-mind.

No place for that. You could just "do one", or start behaving with a little more courtesy for fellow members.

bioengine 08-13-2009 09:27 AM

Benhogan
 
Daryl,
The hips and shoulders turn perpendicular to the spine.
Tilting or dropping the right shoulders has no impact at all on creating ground forces.
Another myth is creating tilting of hips and shoulders. The reason they tilt is they are reacting to the spine, Tilting is a reaction to how the spine is moving.
In golf there is slight right lateral bending of the spine. This occurs to allow the right arm drive down into impact. Slight right lateral bending stabilizes at impact and extension of the upper body occurs at impact.

Regards Hogan,
Hogan talked about he fires his hips first, although was he aware his hips fired first, was he aware how this occurred. Golfers speak about how they feel their body moves although are they aware how this occurs.
Hogan had great lower body mechanics, Hogan knew how to create ground forces which created hip rotational speed for him and stabilizing his lower body at impact.
If you pay close attention you will notice from the beginning of Hogans downswing to impact his left knee maintains the same flexion. Hogan stabilized his lower body at impact and his hips decelerated. This allowed his upper body to close.
At impact notice Hogan sternum and belt buckle are in line this indicates. His shoulders and hip are square. His hips and shoulders are perpendicular to his spine.
Hogan has good movement patterns.

Hogan secret was in the dirt for sure he has wonderful lower body mechanics.
This was Hogans secret he knew how to create ground forces and knew how to stabilize his lower body at impact.

It's not about how big of a hip rotation you have, It's about how fast your can create speed before your lower body stabilizes at impact. Small rotation with fast acceleration is the key.
Which can reach peak speed fastest a huge hip rotation or a small hip rotation.

One other myth is trying to thrust your hips or turn them yourself. This is called superficial speed. When people try this they lack ground forces and can't create stabilization or deceleration of the hips at impact. The upper body can't catch up.Mechanics terms creates the over the top move. Everything spins out left.

12 piece bucket 08-13-2009 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bioengine (Post 66984)
Daryl,
The hips and shoulders turn perpendicular to the spine.
Tilting or dropping the right shoulders has no impact at all on creating ground forces.
Another myth is creating tilting of hips and shoulders. The reason they tilt is they are reacting to the spine, Tilting is a reaction to how the spine is moving.
In golf there is slight right lateral bending of the spine. This allows to be able to drive the right arm into impact. Slight right lateral bending stabilizes at impact and extension of the upper body occurs at impact.

If you pay close attention you will notice from the beginning of hogans downswing to impact his left knee maintains the same flexion. Hogan stabilized his lower body at impact and his hps decelerate. This allowed his upper body to close.
At impact notice Hogan sternum and belt buckle are in line this indicates. his shoulders and hip are square. His hips and shoulders are perpendicular to his spine.

This was Hogans secret he knew how to create ground forces and knew how to stabilize his lower body at impact.

It's not about how big of a hip rotation you have, It's about how fast your can create speed before your lower body stabilizes at impact. Small rotation with fast acceleration is the key.
Which can reach peak speed fastest a huge hip rotation or a small hip rotation.

One other myth is trying to thrust your hips or turn them yourself. This is called superficial speed. When people try this they lack ground forces and can't create stabilization or deceleration of the hips at impact. The upper body can't catch up.Mechanics terms creates the over the top move. Everything spins out left.


Good post . . .Interesting stuff here . . . we are now back on track hopefully from all the COM COAM mess . . . this is the meat of it. . . . This is how people improve not that other crap about whether CF is there or not.

So let's have some further discussion on what you've posted above. I think this is VERY important stuff.

Really like the part about Hogan's knee action . . . Interesting that what he prescribed doing wasn't what he actually ended up doing.





To your point about Hogan's left knee maintaining its flexion . . . . you can see this very cleary in comparison of the two sequences. Also the left knee maintaining it flexion obviously has implications to the other components. Particularly the slant of the hips, spine, and shoulders . . . as you know the club responds accordingly (altering plane angle, angle of approach & attack etc.) . . . so the pivot has HUGE geometry implications. With regards to when and how certain segments get in line.

So you have mention sheer forces (sp?) force across the ground and vertical . . . Is this the left knee piece you mentioned?

Another question . . . could you expand a bit on the lateral bending of the spine vs. the hips going forward. Would the hips moving forward not also creat tilt in the spine?

bioengine 08-13-2009 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket (Post 66988)
Good post . . .Interesting stuff here . . . we are now back on track hopefully from all the COM COAM mess . . . this is the meat of it. . . . This is how people improve not that other crap about whether CF is there or not.

So let's have some further discussion on what you've postedabove. I think this is VERY important stuff.

Really like the part about Hogan's knee action . . . Interesting that what he prescribed doing wasn't what he actually ended up doing.





To your point about Hogan's left knee maintaining its flexion . . . . you can see this very cleary in comparison of the two sequences. Also the left knee maintaining it flexion obviously has implications to the other components. Particularly the slant of the hips, spine, and shoulders . . . as you know the club responds accordingly (altering plane angle, angle of approach & attack etc.) . . . so the pivot has HUGE geometry implications. With regards to when and how certain segments get in line.

So you have mention sheer forces (sp?) force across the ground and vertical . . . Is this the left knee piece you mentioned?

Another question . . . could you expand a bit on the lateral bending of the spine vs. the hips going forward. Would the hips moving forward not also creat tilt in the spine?

The reason I pointed out Hogans Left knee flexion is so you could see he stabilized his lower body.

Ok let me add here so more info to develop a better understanding of lower body mechanics
Center Of Mass is where weight is central.Safely say the belly button.
COP Center Of Pressure is the center pressure between the feet.

Normal forces are the normal force applied perpendicular to ground by golfer through the feet/ground interface.

Shear forces are forces applied to parallel to or along the surface of the ground by golfer through the feet/ground interface.

A golfer starts with a shift of the center of pressure toward the rear foot as the club is "taken away" during the initial portion of the back swing. This shift moves the center of pressure behind the center of mass relative to an axis running along the target line. As the golfer nears the "top" of the back swing and begins transition from back swing rotation into down swing acceleration the center of pressure shifts forward toward the front foot. It is this action creating forward momentum that facilitates the production of shear force at the feet/ground interface. Ground reaction to the shear force created by the feet produces a force couple, which is translated through the legs to the hips segment. The force couple acts on the hips segment to produce torque and rotary acceleration. Once speed is transfered the lower body then stabilizes and the hips decelerate at impact.

The main reason for right lateral bending is so the right arm can react low point in the swing.
You can still move forward and maintain the hips and shoulders to be perpendicular to the spine.
The only time the hips can have an impact on lateral bending is if the left side of your lower body isn't stabilized or anchored.
Although this is a lower body stabilizing issue not spine related.

When hogan does his drill can you notice he lost flexion in his left left leg, his hips are open left and his upper body is square to his hips. Hogan lost his ground forces and lower stability. If hogan did this he may create a superficial hip speed, although he wouldn't have lower body stabilization and hip deceleration. this wouldn't allow hips speed to be transfered to his upper body or Load and fire his muscles.

Again the question remains was Hogan really aware how he created hip rotational speed or the demonstration is how he felt was how he created hip rotational speed. I'm not sure Hogan was aware how important the ground forces he created was the essence to Hogan creating hip rotational speed, lower body stabilizing at impact and hip deceleration, which allowed speed to transfer to his upper body, load and fire his muscles then his upper body would square up to his hips.

What we think or feel we are doing sometimes can be totally opposite to what we are truly doing.

Weetbix 08-13-2009 05:33 PM

Bucket - they are great pictures. How different is what he feels from what he does. Hips in actual swing have turned so much less it's amazing.

BTW - how do you load a pic into a thread. I tried with the Insert Image button and all it did was att a text saying [IMG] reference [/IMG]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 PM.