![]() |
Wow, I did misinterpret the Aiming Point Concept!
Quote:
WOOO HOOO! Thanks guys! |
We don't have to assume that the aiming point is always in front of the ball.....In my motion I actually feel like the aiming point on the plane line is about 2 feet BACK of the ball...hands/club seeking out the ground and pivot seeking out the target ... if your left shoulder doesn't move at all from the top the hands/club will crash the ground WELL behind the ball...pivot can bring the hands forward in order to get low point in the correct spot for the shot at hand....
I don't see how the hands can be moving down at impact...they could feel that way...but how could they if we assume rhythm? Assuming the same rpm would they not have to be moving up? |
Might help?
Quote:
http://lynnblakegolf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=56251&highlight=right+shoulder#po st56251 Quote:
_____________ Thanks you guys! Until reading these posts, I didn't realize that the right shoulder can be fired at the Aiming Point whether Hitting or Swining or 4 Barreling !____I struggled with Geometry in school...acne....the heartbreak of Psoriasis...my goldfish died...once! :laughing9 A related question for me is the Greg McHatton's emphasis on "longitudinal acceleration." Does driving the Right/Back Shoulder to the Aiming Point provide the right "longitudinal acceleration" of the #3 PP? I would guess it does but if this should be further researched elsewhere, just say so. ICT |
Quote:
The hands can be moving down at Impact, but the club head will have been thrown away, unless, like Trevino, the ball is played in the center of the stance, and then before taking the club back, the feet are moved toward the target(the Trevino Two Step), locating the ball off the right foot. :eyes: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Agreed, along the Arc or Angle of Approach .... visually from the players perspective . Along the path of the club head blur so to speak . Or, along the club head path as seen in 3d space..... meaning the Aiming Point is not on the plane line except for balls played at low point. |
Quote:
This is where it gets interesting eh Mike? The straight line thrust vs the true path of the #3. If you throw a stone from top at the ball or aiming point, (passively or actively if you will) does that mean the #3pp travels a straight line towards same target? Id say no (like you offer above) but I do think the intention to do so must straighten out the hand path somewhat. Presenting a different set of physics distinct from Tracing. One that could lend itself to Longitudinal Acceleration , Drag Loading , Delayed Release , smaller Pulley Wheel etc etc etc.....Or a hitters cross line thrust given the direction of thrust towards the aiming point. Intentions vs real??? Is the Aiming Point an Intention or an effort as you say, only? Im fine with that if it is. A pitchers hand doesn't travel a straight line to the catchers mitt. Is he thinking about the curved path of his hand? Doubt it. I dunno. What d'ya think? |
In The Beginning..
Going back to the original thesis of this thread.
If a single plane, with or without the aiming point concept, is used. And, this plane is well above the elbow plane. Does the same problem occur? If not why not? hb |
Questions
-Is the Aiming Point Procedure limited to shots where the butt end of the club points at the plane line? Isn't putting for example , a Tracing deal only? Does this suggest a graduation from Tracing to Aiming Point as the swing lengthens assuming you do want to use the Aiming Point Procedure? -Can you employ the Aiming Point Procedure and the Visual Equivalents (club head blur method of monitoring on plane club head travel) at the same time? Both Visual Equivalents or just the straight line blur Angle of Approach Procedure? Can you throw cross line at the Aiming Point while visually monitoring the curved on plane Arc of Approach ? |
Thinking From This
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 AM. |