[golf2much]

G2M,

I've enjoyed the fact that we are seeing the same description of Jen's plane in our minds eye. I'm still incubating as well.

I think there are some steps to knew discoveries.

First - It's prudent to have another qualified 3rd party expert prove the logic and math.

Second - It needs to be well understood enough that it can be clearly articulated to anyone with a High School Geometry level of understanding.

Third - The applications will evolve slowly over time as the practitioners learn to use a new tool. It may never have a practical application but be a jumping point to something else. I have a hunch it will have at least one practical application in computer modeling of the golf stroke.

For the time being, I'm just going to enjoy the discovery process. I don't think Mathew has thought through the applications or had time to. He's too busy fine tuning the new model.

Pretty cool stuff. In the mean time, there's still lots of s'plane'in to do!

Bagger

Please don't for a minute think I was "busting his chops", quite the contrary, I am very interested in where he is going with this, mostly at this point becaause it makes me think. I want to hear his ideas about how to use this concept to help cultivate my own thoughts. In essence, I am trying to challenge him to think deeper, beyond the geometry, and to the uses of his concepts.

Also, I agree with your evolutionary progression, however, regardless of how precise,logical or well reasoned the concepts might be, if we can't communicate how to apply the concepts, once we are able to explain them succinctly, the likelihood of them being embraced by even the most technical amoung us is low.

Let's keep working at this, pushing the boundary of understanding and see what comes from it; maybe nothing, maybe something fundamental; in any case, all good.

G2M

G2M