P.S. Martee and Mathew, you guys argued every point against me and The Golfing Machine back in the day, and now ya'll are sold out Homer-ites.
Funny huh?
Funny is that I asked questions and responded to your questions with my observations and limited knowledge and this is the response I get?
You might wish to go back and review my points I argued along with why after the infamous 'Hitting Down' thread on another forum you left and my posting went down to about nil on that forum.
Regarding your latest drawing, I know this may sound picky but and I really have issue with some of these photos being used to be used for technical discussions, but...
1. Maybe it is just me, but the ground seems to slope up from left to right (viewers side), which says that the line going upfrom the ground should be sloped. JMO.
2. Here where I am probably not on the same page with everyone else as I did post a thread (no responses) with questions about this topic in general. This Tripod (really a Bi-pod) concept seems to had to have the head directly in the center of the stance if I understand your drawings and comments? Where does this come from as opposed to have a stationary post between the feet?
3. The other question I had and no answers are is this triangle that is being drawn, is it an isosceles triangle? If the apex is to be between the feet, it can't be a right triangle.
Your yellow line appears closer to the swing center than how the triangle is placed and indicates relatively little movement, whereas the red triangle seems to be floating.
I think we have some communication errors here starting with this triangle/tripod/bipod representation and the apex location to the base.
I am trying to understand your position of the back of the neck vs the base of the skull and what movement of the head is then considered acceptable and what movements of the head then require compensations.
Hybrid Mode
