I don't have a dog in this fight, just making observations. But besides Phil's shot (Phil says that he hits the driver on the downswing and it's very obvious on film), it almost appears (on video)that the clubhead is being "driven down" by the collision with the ball, as opposed to moving down through the ball. In other words, the club looks to be moving down after impact, but not necessarily before.
I don't have a dog in this fight, just making observations. But besides Phil's shot (Phil says that he hits the driver on the downswing and it's very obvious on film), it almost appears (on video)that the clubhead is being "driven down" by the collision with the ball, as opposed to moving down through the ball. In other words, the club looks to be moving down after impact, but not necessarily before.
Do you have a link for a slow motion video of Phil? It may appear the way you describe but if you consider the considerable momentum of the clubface at impact, you know it can't be true. Here's a video of one of his team mates
Do you have a link for a slow motion video of Phil? It may appear the way you describe but if you consider the considerable momentum of the clubface at impact, you know it can't be true. Here's a video of one of his team mates
About the collision at impact, if you watch the videos that show closeups at impact, you can clearly see the direction of the club being altered. One of the benefits of sustaining the lag through impact is to try to offset the affects of the impact collision. If impact with the ball is capable of caving in or cracking a clubface, or snapping off the clubhead at the hosel, then surely the force at impact is sufficient enough to alter the path of the club through impact, especially since it is essentially a glancing blow (given that the club has loft).
About the collision at impact, if you watch the videos that show closeups at impact, you can clearly see the direction of the club being altered. One of the benefits of sustaining the lag through impact is to try to offset the affects of the impact collision. If impact with the ball is capable of caving in or cracking a clubface, or snapping off the clubhead at the hosel, then surely the force at impact is sufficient enough to alter the path of the club through impact, especially since it is essentially a glancing blow (given that the club has loft).
Breakdown of the materials of the clubhead is more likely to be due to faulty components of same. Do you remember when John Daly first appeared on the scene and talked of the number of clubheads that he had broken, and the move to Kelvar if memory serves me correctly. None of that today. Maybe someone here with math/physics can calculate the effective momentum of the clubhead at impact and compare it to the mass of the golfball (it has no momentum, being stationary) and show just how wrong your claim is.
Breakdown of the materials of the clubhead is more likely to be due to faulty components of same. Do you remember when John Daly first appeared on the scene and talked of the number of clubheads that he had broken, and the move to Kelvar if memory serves me correctly. None of that today. Maybe someone here with math/physics can calculate the effective momentum of the clubhead at impact and compare it to the mass of the golfball (it has no momentum, being stationary) and show just how wrong your claim is.
The golf ball has no momentum, but it has inertia that the clubhead needs to overcome. And the clubhead loses speed when it impacts the golf ball. I thought that was pretty much universally understood (as far as golf nuts are concerned); I'm not sure I understand what you're disputing.
The golf ball has no momentum, but it has inertia that the clubhead needs to overcome. And the clubhead loses speed when it impacts the golf ball. I thought that was pretty much universally understood (as far as golf nuts are concerned); I'm not sure I understand what you're disputing.
In any such collision both objects are affected. I'm disputing the claim that "if you watch the videos that show closeups at impact, you can clearly see the direction of the club being altered". I've not seen this in any of the videos, and more importantly I wouldn't expect to see it. To my knowledge it isn't even mentioned in Homer's writings, at least not in the 6th Edition.