There are now two camps, one espousing Kelley’s work the other Jorgensen’s. This is like disputing the value of the chicken over the egg.
Naah, Strav . . . no "two camps". There is only Truth (as we individually perceive it and debate it and as it actually is).
Regarding LynnBlakeGolf.com and the participants in civil, animated discussions on this and an infinite variety of other topics, our policy is: "Vive la difference"!
Homer Kelley himself stated that "because of questions of all kinds, reams of additional detail must be made available -- but separately. And probably endlessly" (1-H). The reams of "additional detail" would obviously include precision measurements made possible (and generally available) by modern technologies. Homer was a scientist who always sought to reconcile observations -- however precise -- with law. Given that he has been dead 27 years, he would herald these recent proofs with a hearty "It's about time!".
No one here is attempting to 'squash' the D-Plane. In fact, if I've got my 'readers' on right, the title of this thread is "Must See Videos", and the opening post offers several direct video links to promote its understanding. Then, several posts followed applauding those links.
The first combative post was #12 from footwedge. His agenda was obvious, and his subsequent posts have offered zero educational insights. ["My dad can lick your dad" doesn't qualify as an 'insight'].
Unless his attitude changes -- not holding my breath! -- his presence will be short-lived on this site.
Naah, Strav . . . no "two camps". There is only Truth (as we individually perceive it and debate it and as it actually is).
Regarding LynnBlakeGolf.com and the participants in civil, animated discussions on this and an infinite variety of other topics, our policy is: "Vive la difference"!
Homer Kelley himself stated that "because of questions of all kinds, reams of additional detail must be made available -- but separately. And probably endlessly" (1-H). The reams of "additional detail" would obviously include precision measurements made possible (and generally available) by modern technologies. Homer was a scientist who always sought to reconcile observations -- however precise -- with law. Given that he has been dead 27 years, he would herald these recent proofs with a hearty "It's about time!".
No one here is attempting to 'squash' the D-Plane. In fact, if I've got my 'readers' on right, the title of this thread is "Must See Videos", and the opening post offers several direct video links to promote its understanding. Then, several posts followed applauding those links.
The first combative post was #12 from footwedge. His agenda was obvious, and his subsequent posts have offered zero educational insights. ["My dad can lick your dad" doesn't qualify as an 'insight'].
Unless his attitude changes -- not holding my breath! -- his presence will be short-lived on this site.
Skipper . . . don't run him off . . . we're havin' fun . . . good chance he is one of the poor souls that tilts backwards and rolls the face to the ground . . . there is hope . . . the gift is there . . . just need an extended hand.
Naah, Strav . . . no "two camps". There is only Truth (as we individually perceive it and debate it and as it actually is).
Regarding the participants in civil, animated discussions on this and a variety of other topics, "Vive la difference"!
Homer Kelley was the first to say that "because of questions of all kinds, reams of additional detail must be made available -- but separately. And probably endlessly" (1-H). [Ed Note: The reams of "additional detail" would obviously include that based on 'new' information, which, given that he has been dead 27 years, even he would concede that "It's about time!"]
No one here is attempting to 'squash' the D-Plane. In fact, if I've got my 'readers' on right, the title of this thread is "Must See Videos", and the opening post offers several direct video links to promote its understanding. Then, several posts followed applauding those links.
The first combative post was #12 from footwedge. His agenda was obvious, and his subsequent posts have offered zero educational insights. ["My dad can lick your dad" doesn't qualify as an 'insight'].
Unless his attitude changes -- not holding my breath! -- his presence will be short-lived on this site.
My posts are infantile compared to who? 12 piece. Post 12 was combative that's a stretch, What agenda? My dad can lick your dad? Paranoid you are...lol
My posts are infantile compared to who? 12 piece. Post 12 was combative that's a stretch, What agenda? My dad can lick your dad? Paranoid you are...lol
Man . . . you really gotta call me and apologize now . . first d*ck . . and now infantile . . . we got linoleum anyhow . . . can't afford tile.
Again . . . since we know that you knew that we know that that you knew that the d-plane wasn't in the book . . . what is it that you'd like to discuss?
And tell Mike if he needs a hook up on tile . . . call me . . . but spell my name right . . . . it's Carl Sagan.
If you were a doctor of a science that you proclaim to be junk, would you continue to advertise yourself as a doctor of that science? Would that make you a quack? Hey Britney, gotta feel bad for those guys, must be very confusing...
Kevin
__________________
I could be wrong. I have been before, and will be again.
Hybrid Mode
