It's better to achieve "Positions" through "Alignments" than "Alignments" through "Positions". If "Alignments" change, then "Positions" change. The reverse is not true.
The assertion is correct but the supporting argument is incorrect.
You can't state that if alignments change, positions change but if positions change, alignments don't change. How can something be linked one way but not the other?
Hybrid Mode
