I get GD, so I'll see all 47. Of the people who do get GD, we should have a contest to pick the worst "magic pill" for the average golfer. A nominee can't just be described as "sucky" or something equally subjective. It has to be substantiated in terms of its conflict(s) with TGM competencies. ie "This little gem is guaranteed to foul the Hinge AND bend the Plane because".... etc.
Special weighting should be given to anything that uses vocabulary that obfuscates the TGM nomenclature. ie Try to explain to somebody the Inclined Plane after he has swallowed and digested Jim Hardy's SP/DP defintions.
I don't suggest this to be nasty, I just see it as an interesting op-ed excersize. The winning analysis gets e-shipped off to GD, with everybody's name on it and a demand for "equal time".
Charlie
Hybrid Mode
