If a current golfing star won a British Open using acknowledged Golfing Machine principles, any promoter of the Golfing Machine worth his salt would be extolling his virtues from the rooftops. Henry Cotton won three British Opens with the interruption of World War 11. If he was successful using these same principles, (even if he expressed them in less arcane language) why then would you seek refuge in technicalities instead of welcoming him (or anyone one similar for that matter), with open arms? Would he or they not only be valuable assets to a promoter but a source of practical study and enlightenment to serious students of the Golfing Machine?
Hybrid Mode
