I still am in doubt on when credit should be given as demanded so often here. That is only because of the lack of reference sources in TGM.
Clearly some of the terms are unique to TGM, while others existed prior, maybe not as clear of description, but none the less existed. In fact some terms seemed to have existed that the only explanation avaiable was a photo or sketch, cause the text sure didn't make it clear or even attempt to define it. TGM for the most part didn't rely on implied meanings or understanding, a BIGGIE IMO.
I guess I just wonder if all the comments of being hung up on "Oh did you hear so and so mention the flat left wrist" using TGM again and not acknowledging it. My concern is that this approach may or has prevented TGM from taking its rightful place in the Golf Instruction World. I think it is more important for the information to be used, used properly than reminding everyone it is TGM. I think that those who seek will discover the source, TGM, that may be removed 2 or 3 times.
Still it is nice to see TGM mentioned in high profile.
Hybrid Mode
