|
Originally Posted by Martee
|
|
When reading 2-C-1#1 remember that the Impact interval has been extended to Low Point (Homer has this statement in the first paragraph). Does that clear things up?
|
Great catch Martee - I never even looked at the paragraph.
|
Originally Posted by Martee
|
|
How you can trace either the impact line or the low point line since the ball could be located at low point, thus no difference in line.
|
Yes, but only in that instance, no?
|
Originally Posted by Martee
|
|
The Impact Plane Line and the Low Point Plane line reside on the same plane as shown in 2-C-1#1. The Low Point line is further down the sweet spot plane (lower) thus it presents a 2nd line outside the impact line when represented on the ground.
|
Agreed - which is kinda my point.
|
Originally Posted by Martee
|
|
I probably haven't explained this very well, but if you look at 2-C-1#1 and keep in mind the extended impact interval to Low Point, it should clear it up (I hope).
|
No sir - your explanation is much more thought out then mine...
Let me see if I cant get my thoughts better organized and more concise. While I agree, both impact and low point are located on the same plane, my contention is, from a players perspective, one cannot trace both and get the same result.
Give me a day or so and let me see if I can articulate this better.