I tried to post yesterday but I guess it didn't work due to a computer problem that I have since fixed.
I wanted to say that by the weekend I'll be able to post to this- been busy- but 12 piece would help if you could isolate the area of discussion. What problems does this create for you in understanding? What items seem to contradict this idea? Or maybe you understand it but aren't sure if there is something more? Let me know what you're thinking- and that goes for anyone else also- problems with this concept? .
Thanks,
Mike
Well I reckon I'll give it a stab . . . I was trying to make a connection between the walking machine (walking robot) and The Golfing Machine (human type being type entity). But I wasn't smart enough. As bad as I hate to give you credit for anything good . . . your stuff on the Hands Controlled Pivot is amazing. I think that Mr. K was very much on to something . . . you may be "on something" but on to something too. I'm not smart enought to make the connection but I feel that there is something there.
I think we "bring the world to ourselves" mostly via our hands and eyes (feet too I guess). But when people walk their hands "swing." When they run their hands come up more to their chest and "pump." So I don't know if we got the chicken egg type thing going or what. But in walking (locomtion) our intention is to MOVE SOMEWHERE. But when we hit a golf tater, our intention is to MOVE SOMETHING WITH SOMETHING WE HOLD IN OUR HANDS. Kinda like Mr. K talking about "picking up a cup."
So I reckon if you move you hands or intend to move your hands in a certain manner you as a result would produce more "pivot lag?" Or "Swinging from the Feet" produces the maximum radius and as a result reduces inevitable deceleration . . . do our hands have anything to do with that?
.
Threaded Mode
