Originally Posted by O.B.Left
|
Hey we got 55 posts in before needing to stop to clarify something... not bad. I hope we didnt lose BerntR gonna need him and HB , I know we set aside issues they have with the centres . We can come back to it though with drawings that address that specific issue. Its just not necessary to clarify that issue IMO to discuss the implications of the Geometry of the Circles orbit to ball response given plane and ball location, face angle , hinge action changes. Suffice it to say there is a constant centre and a straight Radius and therefor a circular orbit. Unhuman though this might be... It was a model a mode of examination that Homer had available to him at his time of writing . Much can be deduced from it.
D, that wasnt a jack. Do you want to pause to discuss your post #49 more or just leave it for now? I see some need for friendly debate / discussion coming on some concepts very central to shot shaping.
Bear we're heading towards Hogans stance / ball diagram from Five Lessons dont you worry. But we need to draw as much of the geometry as is possible first , so we're speaking the same language . It gets a little ..... deep in a Homerian way. We might need audio tape transcriptions from the GSEM classes for clarification. Even then it might not come clear. TBD.
|
If this is not really the place for an Aim Point discussion, or the practical application of the Geometry of the Circle, just pm me and I will post these questions on my thread and let the adults alone thinking deep geometrical thoughts.
This is interesting and important stuff.
ICT