Requires a high school physics level of understanding... peruse at your leisure or don't... It does not matter to me and I won't be offended if you opt out. I'll be back in about a week .... business calls.
Requires a high school physics level of understanding... peruse at your leisure or don't... It does not matter to me and I won't be offended if you opt out. I'll be back in about a week .... business calls.
Regards...
Oh, now I get it. Thank God I bumbled through high school and Georgia Tech. That settled, and when you get back next week from "business" . . .
Let's play golf.
I'll take the equally deluded Ted Fort, Jeff Hull and 12 Piece Bucket -- -- against the best ball of you and any three of your referenced Cambridge physicists.
Eighteen holes at Atlanta CC: You guys take carts and play the gals' tees (any gal physicists must play from there, too ).
We'll play the tips and carry our own bags.
The Rules are the Rules: Play by them -- including the ball 'as it lies', no 'gimmes' and count every stroke.
Loser pays all expenses, including green fees, meals, lodging and transportation.
Should be fun.
P.S. For the rest of us: The sound you hear now is no mind scrambling for one or more "referenced physicists" with a scratch handicap, a penchant for the Ladies Tees and looking for a U.S. 'getaway'.
A book named "The science of Golf" published in Feb, 2009 not only mentioned CF but also with calculation...Dr John Wesson....who are you?
__________________
If you cannot take the shoulder down the clubshaft plane, you must take along some other path and add compensations - now, instead of one motion to remember, you wind up with at least two!
A book named "The science of Golf" published in Feb, 2009 not only mentioned CF but also with calculation...Dr John Wesson....who are you?
Yes that guy.... Just because a book gets published does not mean the author knows what he/shes talking about. At least in his physics of soccer book... Wesson doesn't know what he's talking about (with respect to the physics of release). In figure 2.3 of that book he's got one of those (wrong) imaginary arrows I refer above.
There is no force out there... CF or otherwise! The only force the lower leg (in this case) or golf club (in our case) experiences is the force applied at the at the knee or at the hands (disregarding the minor contribution due to gravity)!
Try thinking about it this way.... Forces are vector quantities, they have both direction and magnitude. If you draw an infinite line in the direction of the force and if that line does not happen to go through the center of gravity of that object then when that force is applied it will cause the object to not only translate but also rotate. Grab the periphery of almost any object and pull... does it rotate? Its inertia that causes the object to not only translate but also rotate when the "line of action" of the force does not go through the CG. In essence... THIS not CF is what causes release.
PS LynnB we will see... on second thought no way... pissing matches are for school yards
Actually, having been exposed in your opening post as "ignorant" and a "posuer" -- BTW, the correct spelling is poseur -- with regard to scientific principles, I proposed a golf match, not a "pissing" match. And not in a "school yard", but on a championship layout. Guess you weren't feeling lucky.
The truth is, no_mind, that despite your condescending and incorrect labeling, we here at LBG have learned to make the golf ball behave. And, despite your counsel to our readers that they "humor" us and "move on", we have demonstrated our ability to help our students do the same.
Where Vfict (r) is the potential responsible for the centrifugal force: fc = −ω×(ω×r) = (ω2−ω ωT)r
.
Vfict (r) = −1
2 rT(ω2 − ω ωT)r
Now, Rs and RJ are parallel and MsRs+MJRJ =
0.
[Note that if a particle is moving then addi-
tional Coriolis forces act that are not mentioned
in @
@rVeff (r), so we can’t determine stability from
Veff .
I'll take the equally deluded Ted Fort, Jeff Hull and 12 Piece Bucket -- -- against the best ball of you and any three of your referenced Cambridge physicists.
Yoda - You really need to pick three completely deluded CF (or whatever its called) swingers. Ted is disqualified, Jeff admits he probably pushes through impact, and Bucket uses 72 different patterns during a single round.
I suggest EdZ, MikeO, and Collin Neeman.
__________________
Bagger
1-H "Because of questions of all kinds, reams of additional detail must be made available - but separately, and probably endlessly." Homer Kelly
Thank God I bumbled through high school and Georgia Tech. That settled, and when you get back next week from "business" 
. . . 
-- against the best ball of you and any three of your referenced Cambridge physicists.
Hybrid Mode
