LynnBlakeGolf Forums - View Single Post - Pivot / Non-Pivot Stroke Delivery
View Single Post
  #2  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:33 AM
tongzilla's Avatar
tongzilla tongzilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 825
My new conclusions
Originally Posted by Yoda
The 12-1-0 Pattern is a Three-Accumulator Stroke. It is not for maximum Power.
I see! I thought there is a bit more to using Accumulator #4 than merely utilising Pivot Lag. But no, so...

I have now come to a new conclusion that the 3-Barrel Hitting Pattern in 12-1-0 is inferior in terms of distance compared with the 3-Barrel Swinging Pattern in 12-2-0. Why? Geometrically, the effective Swing Radius is shortened by about four feet (or whatever the distance between your Shoulder and Feet). That is clearly a lot! Physics-wise, the Pivot Power supplying Momentum Transfer is lost. This places a lot of burden on Accumulator #1 which cannot fully compensate for all of the aforementioned factors.

Therefore, everything being roughly equal, if a competent Hitter wants to match the competitive and well-grooved 3-Barrel Swinger, he must use a 4-Barrel Stroke. Otherwise, he will start falling behind!



(PS: I do not want this thread to have anything to do with the Right Arm Swing...looking at no one in particular )
__________________
tongzilla
Reply With Quote