LynnBlakeGolf Forums - View Single Post - How terribly close is hitting and swinging?
View Single Post
  #9  
Old 06-06-2007, 08:28 PM
nuke99's Avatar
nuke99 nuke99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 432
Mike...

This is what I am trying to explain in a different way. We are talking the same thing, but a different "angle of approach". Stick with me for a moment, try to assimilate what I am trying to say ... Not sure I am a good writer ...

Does our tricep know its accumulator 1 or extensor action? The job is only to contract and straighten.

Pointing to chapter on Extensor Action / 7-3 .. and My point is ...

By just pulling the shaft ( yes its still thumb since the grip is connected), the secondary assembly, the behavior of the swinger tricep power becomes Passive . there is NO way the tricep becomes active if its pulled that way .. ( the forearm in this case supports the Secondary assembly ) ( not to mention the wrist becomes "active") , the swing becomes Longer as well since the arm triangle is not 'rigid'

By Pulling the thumb, the primary assembly , the behavior of the Hitter tricep power becomes Active and Accumulator 1 comes to play. The 'Triangle' of both arm , the primary assembly becomes rigid . thus becomes POWER. The swing is short because of that bio mechanical difference.

IN both case , the tricep straightens. It doesn't know why she straighten for ... Accumulator 1 or Extensor action ,, it just straighten.

IN any case .. Rhythm have to be maintained , and the tricep have to keep on straigthening. THUS !... the reason why its isn't that different.

And because the way the left arm is pulled ... the Action /mechanics thus become different . Automatically. Thats why I think to myself,, wow isn't that beautiful ? .... CAUSE ... and Effect

No.3 pressure point is slightly counter - clockwise .. top aft for swinger ( with a ? shape trigger finger) and aft for hitters...

Reason is , the way the elbow is positioned, the grip have to be slightly different. but presumably BOTH strong single .

Since the club is "PULLED" in swinging by pitch elbow... the location of the PP 3 have to behind the club going downplane in the downswing , so the location is 1/4 turn different than hitting( its in the book) ... it becomes more compatible in sequential release.. besides that becomes a wrist throw ... The pitch elbow becomes the secondary assembly support from the right forearm...

And because of these setup and methods... the results become different ..

SO everything actually " linked " together...How beautiful is the brain of Homer Kelly?

And my point is , the 24 components of the swinging and hitting model and seem like so many difference, with a simple change of 3 things ( not simply component) it changes the rest of the component and characteristics .. automatically between a , a DRAG and a DRIVE Pattern in the book.. I AM NOT TALKING OUTSIDE OF THE BOOK. AND I AM TALKING BASIC PATTERN AS WELL

Length of swing = Checked
Rope or Axe = checked
Active or passive tricep = checked
Accumulator 1 or Extensor action = checked
Overlap or sequential release = checked.
Muscle or CF throwaway = checked
Drag or Drive load = checked

Wroooong ? still?


Maybe i shouldn't have mentioned tom watson and bobby etc... It steers people off point.
__________________
God :God is love.

Latest incubator: Finally appreciate why Hogan wrote 19 pages on GRIP. I bet he could write another 40 pages.

Last edited by nuke99 : 06-06-2007 at 08:55 PM.
Reply With Quote