[Richie3Jack]

I look at it like a lot of other things in life. For example, say I have never learned mathematics before and want to learn advanced calculus. The steps for that are to learn counting, addition and subtraction. Then you move onto multiplication and division, then long division, whole numbers, basic calculus, etc.

What most golfers do is go right to 'advanced calculus' (total motion). They may have a decent understanding of addition and subtraction (basic motion) but they are prone to make too many mistakes and don't have it down pat. And a lot of golfers I know that get into TGM tend to think that since they got addition and subtraction down (basic motion) they can move right onto advanced calculus (Total Motion) without an issue.

IMO, consistency comes from learning feel from mechanics. My feel is mostly based around lag pressure and when I'm not hitting the ball that well for me, usually it's because my feel is just a bit off. But it took me 20 years to understand what feel really is and how to grasp feel and I did it by finally understanding what feel from mechanics really was.

The curriculum of basic, acquired and total motions allow the golfer to learn feel from mechanics and it allows the golfer to really find out a lot about themselves and what happens when things don't go as well as they normally should. And you can train the pivot quite well using the curriculum of basic, acquired and total motions. I know I did.

One of the big reasons I believe why the golfer who learns feel from mechanics can improve their precision is I believe quite often 'swing feels' can 'expire.' So if the golfer has a feel that was working for them that expires, they can just go back to the curriculum of basic, acquired and total motion and learning feel from mechanics and perhaps feel something new or 're-feel' their old swing feel and get back to repeating good mechanics and alignments again.


3JACK