The only debate I see is the willingness to follow Homer, his teachings, his reccommendations, and his variations in their purest form with component variations to follow. OR, one can choose to ignore his suggestions.
I have no problem teaching the appropriate finish swivel as explained in the book. It's not my own creation.
Hey Ted,
I cannot agree more with you.
Disagreeing with Mr Kelly is like:
1)Saying that you can develop a better law of thermodynamics.
2)Saying that you could have developed a better law of electricity.
3)Saying that you could have developed a better law of gravity!!! (how about that!)
1)Saying that you can develop a better law of thermodynamics.
2)Saying that you could have developed a better law of electricity.
3)Saying that you could have developed a better law of gravity!!! (how about that!)
Flat-out disagreeing with him definitely is sketchy man....you just have to think about how much he knew....
But is anyone really flat-out disagreeing? It's just customizing...if it really comes down to it. I personally agree that one should strive to fit most of his recommendations....but that's not always the way it works....for lots of reasons.
I just think that Homer has never said you MUST do anything....except for 3 things....did he?
For the record...I do agree that one should strive for a Stationary Head....
Hybrid Mode
