Am I correct in observing Mr. Blake making the slightest weight shift?
It looks like his lower body only serves the upper body turn to the hitting position. And then, most of the focus is on the down, out and through swing.
Is it supposed to be that simple-looking?
How ironic that the meticulous observations of Mr. Kelly are in the service of such a simple-looking motion. Now, if I can just imitate that motion!
As a teacher, I am reminded that artists in middle ages were employed by physicians to dig-up the dead, expose diseased organs by removing skin, and carefully sketch muscles, tissue, ligaments and diseased organs in order to create medical textbooks. All the while, the participants risked arrest and the wrath of the local church for desecration of the dead.
Originally Posted by KevCarter
O.B.
I may be wrong, but I have not thought of it as a paradox at all. I think of it as mandatory if we want to comply with the plane after impact.
Per 4-D-O
Perhaps I am taking it a little out of context, but I have always been of the opinion this is in line with YODA's teaching, and I feel it is very apparent in his swing.
Sorry for posting this picture as a reference so often, but I enjoy it as my model. (I wish...)
Kevin
__________________
HP, grant me the serenity to accept what I cannot change, the courage to change what I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. Progress and not perfection is the goal every day!
Threaded Mode
