If I had a dime for every time someone said that TGM is wrong, I'd be $$$$. If I had a dime for every time someone presented evidence that TGM was wrong, I couldn't by a 10 cent cup of coffee.
I'm so tired of people that talk about their claims rather than providing information to support their claim.
Ringer, support your claims with analysis and not propaganda. I assume you can do that, right? Otherwise, what's the point of this dialogue?
Maybe this isn't a dialogue but a "baiting game" you've been trained to play? Either give me something substantial that explains your claim that Homer was wrong or that Jorgensen was correct or won't respond again.
If I had a dime for every time someone said that TGM is wrong, I'd be $$$$. If I had a dime for every time someone presented evidence that TGM was wrong, I couldn't by a 10 cent cup of coffee.
I'm so tired of people that talk about their claims rather than providing information to support their claim.
Ringer, support your claims with analysis and not propaganda. I assume you can do that, right? Otherwise, what's the point of this dialogue?
Maybe this isn't a dialogue but a "baiting game" you've been trained to play? Either give me something substantial that explains your claim that Homer was wrong or that Jorgensen was correct or won't respond again.
Others have already stopped. I may as well too.
What's really funny to me is that you actually believe I'm attacking TGM or Homer. I said nothing of the sort.
Homer went on to describe the importance of knowing where the low point was (2-J-2) but I don't know where he explained to line up differently to compensate for this... do you? That's one question I posed but NEVER got an answer for. Instead you just came after me asking for proof of something.. lord knows what you're even wanting proof of.
The other thing I asked for is where Homer explained why higher lofted clubs result in less curvature. The D-Plane explains this quite easily as I did in my video, but 2-A makes no such conclusions as you suggested it did.
Finally, what "claims" am I making? What statement have I made that needs backing up? I'm simply saying that the D-Plane is an explanation of the geometry involved during impact that Homer didn't expand upon himself. Though he might have if he had access to the technology. You somehow interpreted this as some sort of threat on your livelihood apparently because you're lashing out like a wild dog at me. All I want is the truth.
__________________
The 4 Jobs in golf
1. Environment - Gets in the way
2. Ball - Interacts with the environment
3. Club - Moves the ball in a specific way
4. Golfer - Swings the club I already paid good money for the first 3...
What's really funny to me is that you actually believe I'm attacking TGM or Homer. I said nothing of the sort.
Homer went on to describe the importance of knowing where the low point was (2-J-2) but I don't know where he explained to line up differently to compensate for this... do you? That's one question I posed but NEVER got an answer for. Instead you just came after me asking for proof of something.. lord knows what you're even wanting proof of.
The other thing I asked for is where Homer explained why higher lofted clubs result in less curvature. The D-Plane explains this quite easily as I did in my video, but 2-A makes no such conclusions as you suggested it did.
Finally, what "claims" am I making? What statement have I made that needs backing up? I'm simply saying that the D-Plane is an explanation of the geometry involved during impact that Homer didn't expand upon himself. Though he might have if he had access to the technology. You somehow interpreted this as some sort of threat on your livelihood apparently because you're lashing out like a wild dog at me. All I want is the truth.
Lashing out like a wild dog? You guys are all delusional.
All you want is the truth? All you guys do nothing but twist other peoples words to make them look bad so you win debates. Winning debates has nothing to do with finding the truth.
Nobody's buying what you are selling.
Kevin
__________________
I could be wrong. I have been before, and will be again.
I do believe HK had a complete understanding of the alignments that would dynamically reproduce the positions recently explained by "D" plane “graphics”. Alignments are vastly superior to position. Reading- 7-2 then 2-j-3 then 2 then 1 a little 2-E and throw in a dabble of 6-E and one can start to perform ball flight control. After all is said, How do you get it into the computer (chapter 14)? A vector diagram or a feel? That is the value of TGM. With understanding TGM becomes a vastly superior tool for both instruction and instructed.
Homer went on to describe the importance of knowing where the low point was (2-J-2) but I don't know where he explained to line up differently to compensate for this... do you? That's one question I posed but NEVER got an answer for.
Regarding "line up differently" . . .
I think I read elsewhere in your posts that you mean lining up more Open with the higher lofted clubs and more closed with the lower lofted ones. Is that right? Are you referring to the Stance Line in relation to the Plane Line? If not, then what? Please explain what you mean, and ideally, why it is necessary.
I think I read elsewhere in your posts that you mean lining up more Open with the higher lofted clubs and more closed with the lower lofted ones. Is that right? Are you referring to the Stance Line in relation to the Plane Line? If not, then what? Please explain what you mean, and ideally, why it is necessary.
Thanks!
Boss . . . what he is trying to say is . . . if the ball is taken beyond low point club is traveling back up and in and as a result you should aim right to account for those plane/orbit conditions . . .assuming you are hitting a straight shot . . . vicey vercy for back of low point . . .
7-2 is likely where the d-plane folks would take issue with the Machine I'd say.
Boss . . . what he is trying to say is . . . if the ball is taken beyond low point club is traveling back up and in and as a result you should aim right to account for those plane/orbit conditions . . .assuming you are hitting a straight shot . . . vicey vercy for back of low point . . .
7-2 is likely where the d-plane folks would take issue with the Machine I'd say.
As I recall, he referred to being able to explain, paraphrasing now, why "Hogan adjusted his stance for the higher and lower lofted clubs". I recall no reference to Low Point.
But there may have been. Anyway, it's hard to come up with a decent answer when you don't understand the question.
As I recall, he referred to being able to explain, paraphrasing now, why "Hogan adjusted his stance for the higher and lower lofted clubs". I recall no reference to Low Point.
But there may have been. Anyway, it's hard to come up with a decent answer when you don't understand the question.
Can't wait to hear back!
Sorry that it wasn't more clear Lynn. I guess you haven't been totally apprised of what the D-Plane is and how it operates so it would of course be difficult to understand the question.
Essentially IF (and this is a big if) a person catches the ball while the clubhead is starting to travel back up and in past low point, then the path would be leftward. To offset for this one should set up a bit more closed. With short irons the ball is struck further back from low point and therefore the path is traveling out to the right. To compensate for this you need to align to the left.
__________________
The 4 Jobs in golf
1. Environment - Gets in the way
2. Ball - Interacts with the environment
3. Club - Moves the ball in a specific way
4. Golfer - Swings the club I already paid good money for the first 3...
Sorry that it wasn't more clear Lynn. I guess you haven't been totally apprised of what the D-Plane is and how it operates so it would of course be difficult to understand the question.
Essentially IF (and this is a big if) a person catches the ball while the clubhead is starting to travel back up and in past low point, then the path would be leftward. To offset for this one should set up a bit more closed. With short irons the ball is struck further back from low point and therefore the path is traveling out to the right. To compensate for this you need to align to the left.
Why would I need the D Plane to explain this? Sounds like simple geometry to me.
__________________
"The only real shortcuts are more and more know how"...TGM
Hybrid Mode
