Alignments Vs. Positions

Daryl · #1 03-13-2011, 10:23 AM

Originally Posted by ndwolfe81

What is the difference between alingments and positions? Aren't alingments actually positions too?

I may just be missing the precived image by TGM. Can someone explain the difference?

It's better to achieve "Positions" through "Alignments" than "Alignments" through "Positions". If "Alignments" change, then "Positions" change. The reverse is not true.

***bambam*** · #2 03-13-2011, 11:05 AM

Originally Posted by Daryl

It's better to achieve "Positions" through "Alignments" than "Alignments" through "Positions". If "Alignments" change, then "Positions" change. The reverse is not true.

Well said, Daryl

**KevCarter** · #3 03-13-2011, 12:40 PM

Originally Posted by Daryl

It's better to achieve "Positions" through "Alignments" than "Alignments" through "Positions". If "Alignments" change, then "Positions" change. The reverse is not true.

Sweet, Alignments in Motion...

Kevin

JerryG · #4 03-13-2011, 07:00 PM

Once I set my machine, I just try to put it in motion. Indeed, I Align my Machine and move it through the ball.

Meditation · #5 10-15-2012, 12:27 AM

Originally Posted by Daryl

It's better to achieve "Positions" through "Alignments" than "Alignments" through "Positions". If "Alignments" change, then "Positions" change. The reverse is not true.

The assertion is correct but the supporting argument is incorrect.

You can't state that if alignments change, positions change but if positions change, alignments don't change. How can something be linked one way but not the other?

Alignments Vs. Positions

The Golfing Machine - Basic